| 查看: 1442 | 回复: 4 | |||
[交流]
看到有讨论Scientific Reports是否为水刊的评论，贴一下其审稿要求。 已有4人参与
|
|
其最主要的问题在于“no requirement for novelty or broad interest”。不过这个“novelty or broad interest”如果仅靠有限的几个审稿人来判断其实也是片面的，那么“ judgement themselves post-publication”就看引用数了。目前SR的引用数应该说明其至少算不差的期刊。 To be considered for publication in Scientific Reports, a paper should be technically sound. Technical soundness refers to both methods and analysis, i.e. the methods must be appropriate and properly conducted, and the conclusions drawn must be fully supported by the data. Referees are asked not to make a judgement on the paper's importance - we ask the scientific community to make this judgement themselves post-publication. Scientific Reports, unlike other journals published by Nature Publishing Group, does not, therefore, require an advance within a given field, and there is no requirement for novelty or broad interest. The review form will rapidly allow you to provide feedback in the following areas: - Is the paper technically sound? - Are the claims convincing? If not, what further evidence is needed? - Are the claims fully supported by the experimental data? - Are the claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature? - If the manuscript is unacceptable in its present form, does the study seem sufficiently promising that the authors should be encouraged to consider a resubmission in the future? In addition to answering the previous questions, you can provide further information as free-text, including comments that may answer the following: - Is the manuscript clearly written? If not, how could it be made more accessible? - Have the authors done themselves justice without overselling their claims? - Have they been fair in their treatment of previous literature? - Have they provided sufficient methodological detail that the experiments could be reproduced? - Is the statistical analysis of the data sound? - Are there any special ethical concerns arising from the use of animals or human subjects? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有3人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有9人回复
-
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有13人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有8人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有4人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有10人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有5人回复
-
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有6人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- scientific reports 预警
已经有18人回复
- 有谁知道Scientific Reports 审稿时间多长啊？？
已经有20人回复
- 大家觉得 RSC advances 这个杂志怎么样？望多多评论
已经有72人回复
- scientific reports到底现在是不是SCI，为啥没检索到，为啥讨论那么激烈呢。
已经有7人回复
- 投稿Scientific Reports，技术审查未通过，其中这一条请大家帮忙看一下是什么意思？
已经有3人回复
- 请问scientific reports是什么级别的刊物？
已经有14人回复
- Nature系列期刊Scientific Reports报道了无定形碳化硅（SiC)转化为石墨烯的新方法
已经有62人回复
- Nature旗下的scientific report到底怎样？
已经有29人回复
- 请问有人投过scientific reports吗？
已经有57人回复
- 请大家讨论一下最近nature的最新期刊scientific reports是什么档次的期刊？
已经有40人回复
- 八一八Nature旗下的一个新出的期刊Scientific Reports
已经有11人回复
shdlhjzwl
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 43 (小学生)
- 金币: 2461.1
- 散金: 5700
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 938
- 在线: 866.3小时
- 虫号: 2026723
- 注册: 2012-09-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2015-07-01 12:55:03
3楼2015-07-01 14:02:32
4楼2015-07-23 15:30:01
vincent_hpax
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 447 (硕士)
- 金币: 20145
- 散金: 86
- 红花: 50
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 4414
- 在线: 295.6小时
- 虫号: 3959873
- 注册: 2015-07-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 微生物生理与生物化学
5楼2015-07-23 15:33:04