¿ÆÑÐÈËÔ±¼°´óѧ½Ìʦ³£Îª×Ô¼ºµÄÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÎIJɲ»ºÃ¡¢¾äʽµ¥µ÷¿àÄÕ£¬Ò²Îª±à¼ÒªÇó¡°improve your article¡±ÄÓÍ·²»ÒÑ£¬ÆäÖ÷ÒªÔÒòÔÚÓÚ¶ÔһЩ¾«²Ê¾äʽÕÆÎյò»¹»¡£
1 In summary, then, there is a large amount of evidence which suggests, but does not prove, that
×ܶøÑÔÖ®£¬´óÁ¿µÄÖ¤¾Ý±íÃ÷£¬µ«ÉÐδ֤ʵµÄÊÇ
2 This is explained by assuming that
ÕâÖÖÏÖÏó¿ÉÒÔÓÃÒ»ÖÖ¼ÙÉè½âÊÍ£¬ÄǾÍÊÇ
3 Recently, doubt has been expressed as to
½üÀ´£¬ÓÐѧÕ߶ԡ¡¡Ìá³öÁËÖÊÒÉ
4 We present here experiment data demonstrating that
ÔÚ±¾ÎÄÖÐÎÒÃǽ«ÓÃʵÑéÊý¾ÝÖ¤Ã÷
5 Thesee studyes are based on the assumption that
ÕâЩÑо¿¶¼ÊÇ»ùÓÚÒ»Ïî¼ÙÉ裬¼´
6 Such¡¡¡¡.would have far-reaching consequences for our understanding of the mechanisms of¡¡..
Õâ¡¡¡¿ÉÄܶÔÎÒÃÇÁ˽⡡¡µÄ»úÖƾßÓÐÉîÔ¶µÄÒâÒå
7 Our results also particially disagree with those of
ÎÒÃǵĽá¹ûÒ²Óë¡¡¡..Óд˲»Í¬
8 To test these possibilities, we first ¡¡¡¡ and then
ΪÁËÑéÖ¤ÕâЩ¿ÉÄÜÐÔ£¬ÎÒÃÇÊ×ÏÈ¡¡..È»ºó¡..
9 Over the past few years, numerical models have been developed ffor investigating and studying its long term behaviour.
¹ýÈ¥¼¸Ä꣬ΪÑо¿¡¡..¼°Æ䳤ÆÚÌØÐÔ·¢Õ¹½¨Á¢ÁËÈô¸ÉÊýֵģʽ
10 Even if the preferred interpretation is not correct, the data strongly sugggest
¼´Ê¹ËùÑ¡È¡µÄ½âÊͲ»ÕýÈ·£¬ÕâЩÊý¾ÝÈÔÄܳä·ÖÏÔʾ³ö
11 In weighing the¡¡.. data, we have taken extreme care to assure optimal data utilization withou conflicting with the¡¡¡. data.
ÔÚ¿¼ÂÇ¡¡.Êý¾ÝµÄȨÖØʱ£¬ÎÒÃǷdz£½÷É÷£¬ÒÔÈ·±£Ê¹ÓÃ×îÓŵÄÊý¾Ý£¬±ÜÃâºÍ¡¡¡Êý¾Ý³öÏÖ²»Ò»ÖÂ
12 We thank ¡¡¡.for discussion and review of this article. This research was supported by
ÎÒÃǸÐл¡¡..µÄÌÖÂۺͶԴËÎĵÄÉóÔÄ£¬¸ÃÑо¿µÃµ½ÁË¡..µÄÖ§³Ö
13 Our purpose here is to examine the principal objections to our interpretations and present additional data.
ÔÚ´Ë£¬ÎÒÃǵÄÄ¿µÄÊǼì²é¶ÔÎÒÃÇÀíÂÛµÄÖ÷Òª·´¶ÔÒâ¼û£¬²¢²¹³ä¸ü¶àÊý¾Ý
14 In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, it is conservative to suggest that
ÓÉÓÚȱ·¦ÓÐÁ¦µÄ·´ÃæÖ¤¾Ý£¬±£ÊصØÀ´¿´
15 The experimental designs of these investigators suffer yet another serious disadvantage.
ÕâЩÑо¿ÕßµÄʵÑéÉè¼Æ»¹ÓÐÒ»¸öÑÏÖصÄȱÏÝ |