24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2559  |  回复: 21
【奖励】 本帖被评价18次,作者anruoka增加金币 14.2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

anruoka

木虫 (正式写手)


[资源] FDA 2015年4月28日 biosimilar 生物仿制药三份新的指导原则出炉

FDA Final Guidance for Determining Biosimilarity

On April 28, 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the much-anticipated final guidance documents related to implementation of the Biologics Price Control and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA). Not surprisingly, the FDA’s three final guidance documents are substantially similar to the draft guidance issued in February 2012, discussed here, and reflect the FDA’s recent statements and actions leading to the approval of Sandoz’s Zarxio® product (filgrastim-sndz). The three final guidance documents can be found here:
Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product (“SC”) (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Dru ... ces/UCM291128.pdf);
Quality Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Protein Product (“QC”) (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Dru ... ces/UCM291134.pdf); and
Biosimilars: Questions and Answers Regarding Implementation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“Q & A”) (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Dru ... ces/UCM444661.pdf).

The final guidance documents address broad concepts associated with demonstrating biosimilarity, including an emphasis on structural and functional characterization (SC at 9-11), human pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data (SC at 13-17), comparative human clinical studies if there is “residual uncertainty” regarding clinically meaningful differences (SC at 18-20), non-U.S. licensed reference product comparators (SC at 6), extrapolation across indications (SC at 21-22); expression systems and manufacturing processes (QC at 10-11), analysis of the reference product (QC at 14-15), and analysis of the finished drug product (QC at 15-16). The final guidance documents do not, however, address interchangeability, as the FDA indicated that “[g]eneral scientific issues relating to the demonstration of interchangeability will be addressed separately.” (SC at 3, n.6.)

Like the draft guidance, the final guidance recommends that biosimilar applicants utilize a “stepwise approach to developing data and information needed to support a demonstration of biosimilarity.” (SC at 7.) According to the FDA, this stepwise approach will help the applicant and the agency evaluate “the extent to which . . . residual uncertainty” remains concerning the biosimilarity of the proposed product to the reference product. (Id.) As part of this stepwise approach, the FDA “encourages sponsors to consult extensively with the Agency . . . throughout development as needed.” (SC at 8.) Indeed, the FDA indicated that early discussion with the FDA “will facilitate biosimilar development.” (SC at 23.)

The FDA also reiterated its commitment to considering the “totality-of-the-evidence” when evaluating the data and information contained in a biosimilar application and will apply a “risk-based approach.” (SC at 8.) Applying the totality-of-the-evidence approach, the FDA indicated that an applicant could still demonstrate biosimilarity even if there are formulation or minor structural differences, so long those differences do not result in a “clinically meaningful” difference between the biosimilar and reference product. (Id.) The FDA’s implementation of the totality-of-the-evidence approach can be seen in the Agency’s recent review and approval of Zarxio®, where the review committee relied on Zarxio’s extensive use in Europe and the fact that Sandoz was able to establish biosimilarity despite using a different buffering system.

Although human comparative clinical studies will likely be needed, at least in the immediate future, the FDA did indicate that such studies might only be needed “to support a demonstration of biosimilarity if there is residual uncertainty about whether there are clinically meaningful differences between the proposed product and the reference product” after conducting structural and functional characterizations, animal testing, human PK and PD studies and clinical immunogenicity assessment. (SC at 18.) “A sponsor should provide a scientific justification if it believes that a comparative clinical study is not necessary.” (Id.)

Biosimilar development is being conducted on a global scale with several products already on the market in different countries. In view of this reality and the BPCIA’s requirement that a proposed product must be biosimilar to a single reference product previously licensed by the FDA, potential biosimilar applicants want to know whether the FDA would allow comparison of animal and human clinical data to a non-U.S.-licensed product. According to the FDA, the short answer is “Yes.” (Q&A at 8; SC at 7.) The FDA made clear however, that “as a scientific matter,” an application must contain at least one PK study and, if appropriate, at least one PD study comparing the biosimilar product to the U.S.-licensed product. (Q&A at 8.) If comparisons to a non-U.S.-licensed product are made, the applicant “should provide adequate data or information to scientifically justify the relevance of these comparative data to an assessment of biosimilarity and establish an acceptable bridge to the U.S.-licensed reference product.” (Q&A at 8; SC at 6.)

As we now know from the recent approval of Zarxio®, the FDA will allow extrapolations to other indications if the proposed product meets the requirements for licensure as a biosimilar. In order to extrapolate, applicants “need to provide sufficient scientific justification” for such an extrapolation, and should address the mechanism of action(s) in each additional indication, PK, bio-distribution, immunogenicity, and expected toxicities of the biosimilar product in different patient populations. (SC at 21.)

Finally, the FDA provided contact information if an applicant has a question about its proposed biosimilar development program. If the reference product is regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), applicants are instructed to contact the Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars Team at 301-796-0700. If the reference product is regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), applicants should contact the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development at 800-835-4709 or 240-402-7800, or email ocod@fda.hhs.gov. Finally, with general questions concerning the FDA’s implementation of the BPCIA, applicants and reference product sponsors should contact Sandra Benton in CDER’s Office of Medical Policy at 301-796-2500.

With the recent approval of Zarxio®, and several additional biosimilar applications in the queue from Celltrion/Hospira (biosimilar to Remicade&reg, Apotex (biosimilar to Neupogen&reg, and Hospira (biosimilar to Epogen® and Procrit&reg, the FDA should provide, over the coming months, further insights on the requirements necessary to obtain approval of much more complex biosimilar products.
回复此楼

» 本帖附件资源列表

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

仿制药研发申报 生物医药操作规程 药-提升,要-努力,钥-这里

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

anruoka

木虫 (正式写手)


引用回帖:
15楼: Originally posted by 周兵lofter at 2015-09-06 11:07:04
有没有中文翻译版的啊

暂无
16楼2015-09-06 11:53:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 22 个回答

1949stone

荣誉版主 (知名作家)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

也收到FDA的提醒邮件了
3楼2015-05-05 23:07:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wobaby

铁虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 1949stone at 2015-05-05 23:07:34
也收到FDA的提醒邮件了

怎么才能收到啊 谢谢
9楼2015-05-07 22:30:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
wangshui14楼
2015-05-09 06:16   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
wang_q_h5楼
2015-05-06 12:30   回复  
三星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
06药学6楼
2015-05-06 22:38   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
mazhenggen13楼
2015-05-08 18:09   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
2015-05-07 09:10   回复  
五星好评  
tangjianju11楼
2015-05-08 11:05   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
2015-05-07 21:46   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
wayky12楼
2015-05-08 15:21   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
cccu3310楼
2015-05-08 00:43   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
2015-05-05 17:14   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
2015-05-05 23:11   回复  
五星好评  顶一下,感谢分享!
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 281求调剂(0805) +9 烟汐忆海 2026-03-16 19/950 2026-03-19 11:42 by laoshidan
[考研] 一志愿中国海洋大学,生物学,301分,求调剂 +4 1孙悟空 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-18 17:59 by fivewind
[考研] 311求调剂 +6 26研0 2026-03-15 6/300 2026-03-18 14:43 by haxia
[考研] 297求调剂 +8 戏精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 8/400 2026-03-18 14:30 by laoshidan
[考研] 材料专硕274一志愿陕西师范大学求调剂 +6 薛云鹏 2026-03-13 6/300 2026-03-18 14:14 by 脱颖而出
[考研] 331求调剂(0703有机化学 +7 ZY-05 2026-03-13 8/400 2026-03-18 14:13 by 007_lilei
[考研] 299求调剂 +5 △小透明* 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-18 11:49 by 尽舜尧1
[考研] 301求调剂 +9 yy要上岸呀 2026-03-17 9/450 2026-03-18 08:58 by 无际的草原
[考研] 梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入 +8 一鸭鸭哟 2026-03-14 10/500 2026-03-17 15:07 by 一鸭鸭哟
[考研] 278求调剂 +3 Yy7400 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-17 08:24 by laoshidan
[考研] 304求调剂 +4 ahbd 2026-03-14 4/200 2026-03-16 16:48 by 我的船我的海
[考研] 326求调剂 +3 mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 3/150 2026-03-16 07:33 by Iveryant
[考研] 294求调剂 +3 Zys010410@ 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-15 10:59 by zhq0425
[考研] 中科大材料与化工319求调剂 +3 孟鑫材料 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-14 20:10 by ms629
[考研] 本科南京大学一志愿川大药学327 +3 麦田耕者 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-14 20:04 by 外星文明
[基金申请] 现在如何回避去年的某一个专家,不知道名字 +3 zk200107 2026-03-12 6/300 2026-03-14 17:13 by zk200107
[考研] 297求调剂 +4 学海漂泊 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-14 11:51 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 材料与化工求调剂一志愿 985 总分 295 +8 dream…… 2026-03-12 8/400 2026-03-13 22:17 by 星空星月
[考研] 328化工专硕求调剂 +4 。,。,。,。i 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 14:44 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 308求调剂 +3 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 14:30 by 求调剂zz
信息提示
请填处理意见