24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 9964  |  回复: 23
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

CWQ1900

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] ACS NANO 投稿被拒,一个小修,一个建议改投,改投哪个期刊合适?

小弟最近投了一篇ACS NANO 审了一多月被拒。两个reviewer, 一个建议小修后接收,一个建议改投专业期刊,原因是没有broad interest,但是总体评价还算ok,编辑是Peter Norlander, 给据了。伤心!
文章内容偏物理和非线性光学方面,有实验和理论部分。不知道改投哪个期刊合适?各位大侠能不能帮忙给些建议?希望再投能够快点出结果,着急需要文章毕业。小弟自己上网搜了下,感觉JPCC, ACS PHOTONICS,OPTICS Express 都是可能的目标期刊,不知道哪个速度快,容易中些?ACS PHOTONICS是个新刊,按理说容易中些,但是看了官网的文章,感觉审稿时间好长。有没有投过的大侠帮忙指导一下?另外,ACS NANO 的审稿意见对再投JPCC 和 ACS PHOTONICS有没有帮助?Optics Express 呢?希望能有过来人给指点迷津,感激不尽。
最后附上审稿意见:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish in a different journal

Additional Questions:
Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes

If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field:

Is it appealing to a broad audience?: No

Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: No

Significance: Moderate

Novelty: High

Broad interest: Moderate

Scholarly presentation: High

Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish in ACS Nano after minor revisions noted.

Additional Questions:
Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No

If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: It is unlikely to be improved to be in the top 15%.

Is it appealing to a broad audience?: No

Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes

Significance: Moderate

Novelty: High

Broad interest: Moderate

Scholarly presentation: High
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

635458299

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by hjnwml at 2015-04-07 07:48:40
OE应该没有问题,感觉是这个期刊快,不过要交钱

OE不需要交钱的
14楼2015-04-08 11:37:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

635458299

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by CWQ1900 at 2015-04-07 09:03:53
谢谢。看了网上发表的OE的文章,一审周期确实很快,一个月或少于一个月。做的内容也是非线性光学方面的。比较大的问题是转投OE的话ACS NANO审稿人的意见会起作用吗?另外OE是不是不接受supporting information? 如 ...

OE也接受supporting information的,审稿确实很快,也不收钱!我就中过两篇。
15楼2015-04-08 11:38:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 CWQ1900 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见