24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 345  |  回复: 0

Venusy

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求大神帮忙修改一下我写的Argument 作文哈~十分感谢~

Title:
The following is a memorandum from the director of personnel to the president of Get-Away Airlines.
"Since our mechanics are responsible for inspecting and maintaining our aircraft, Get-Away Airlines should pay to send them to the Quality-Care Seminar, a two-week seminar on proper maintenance procedures. I recommend this seminar because it is likely to be a wise investment, given that the automobile racing industry recently reported that the performance of its maintenance crews improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar(1). These maintenance crews perform many of the same functions as do our mechanics, including refueling and repairing engines(2). The money we spend on sending our staff to the seminar will inevitably lead to improved maintenance(3) and thus to greater customer satisfaction(4) along with greater profits for our airline(5)."

   In this argument, the author claims that their mechanics should be send to the Quality-Care Seminar which is a two-week seminar on proper maintenance procedures. In support of his/her conclusion, the arguer cites the example of automobile maintenance crew which functions is similar to their mechanics advances a lot attended to this seminar. What’s more, they will make more profits with more customer satisfaction after maintenance. Beyond these data, more specific evidence would, however, be still in great need in solidifying the projected result.
   In the first place, the arguer fails to provide complete information in illustrating the performance of automobile maintenance crew improves much when attend to the seminar. The improved performance of maintenance crew might not be the result of joining into the seminar. Other conditions and factors will affect the performance of crew. For example, the maintenance crew may learn a lot from experts in this field and professional books , it is reasonable its performance will be better. For lack of detailed information, we can not hastily evaluate the performance of mechanics in airline will be also improved after attending the seminar.
   Secondly, the author recommends that their mechanics attend to the same seminar as automobile maintenance crew which apparently has some positive effect in joining the seminar. The arguer only provides the information about they have some functions alike. But we are not told about these two are not similar enough at every aspect. Maybe people in this seminar are good at automobile maintenance crew but not well about mechanics airline. Unless the author demonstrates that these two are comparable enough, we could not conclude this seminar is suitable for mechanics as well.
   Lastly, the improved maintenance may not contribute to customer satisfaction and high profit. Customer satisfaction is influenced by many conditions and factors which includes the fee of flight, the attitude of server, and the efficiency of whole process. Moreover, many other airlines possess well mechanics, if other factors like the fee are better than this airline company, it is more competent to win more customers. Thus, our airline could not have greater profits.
  To sum up, the argument lacks credibility, because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author maintained. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide more specific and clear information about how much comparability the automobile crew and mechanics in airline, and make sure other conditions is superior to any airline companies so that they can make more profit.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

智能机器人

Robot (super robot)

我们都爱小木虫

找到一些相关的精华帖子,希望有用哦~

科研从小木虫开始,人人为我,我为人人
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Venusy 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 j5mmowWXNWxv 2026-09-05 4/200 2026-09-06 12:49 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[基金申请] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 j5mmowWXNWxv 2026-09-05 3/150 2026-09-06 12:49 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[考博] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 j5mmowWXNWxv 2026-09-05 4/200 2026-09-06 12:29 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[找工作] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 7/350 2026-09-06 11:40 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 7/350 2026-09-06 11:20 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 19/950 2026-09-06 11:15 by jiangxuan2004
[博后之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 8/400 2026-09-06 11:09 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[教师之家] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 8/400 2026-09-06 11:00 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[考研] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-04 7/350 2026-09-06 11:00 by eObJPa4gWmp6
[考研] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 4/200 2026-09-06 07:20 by E1iiBLMU2XnD
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +6 7ZYIEW2YWn72 2026-09-04 9/450 2026-09-06 06:00 by E1iiBLMU2XnD
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +8 CRJ0Aq2FtVH0 2026-09-03 15/750 2026-09-06 05:48 by E1iiBLMU2XnD
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 5/250 2026-09-06 02:39 by E1iiBLMU2XnD
[论文投稿] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 jPDp0sc2B7zQ 2026-09-05 5/250 2026-09-06 02:19 by E1iiBLMU2XnD
[基金申请] 面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数 +12 jackleilei 2026-09-03 13/650 2026-09-05 18:10 by fireguard
[文学芳草园] 两块石头 +6 阿美_Lml888 2026-09-03 8/400 2026-09-05 13:52 by 阿美_Lml888
[文学芳草园] 初秋的晨风 +4 阿美_Lml888 2026-09-04 6/300 2026-09-05 13:51 by 阿美_Lml888
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 9/450 2026-09-05 13:11 by haizai99
[博后之家] 广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!! +4 SCSIOyxguo 2026-09-03 7/350 2026-09-05 10:39 by Honglianlian
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
信息提示
请填处理意见