应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 投了业内最顶级的期刊，被批的一无是处，还要再投么？
21/1返回列表
查看: 653  |  回复: 1
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

insecrety

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 投了业内最顶级的期刊，被批的一无是处，还要再投么？ 已有1人参与

本来写得一篇综述，老板觉得写得很好，可以投journal, 结果被要求投了业内最顶级的期刊，审稿意见被批的一无是处，还要再投么？真是郁闷。博士期刊的第一篇文章！

There is no doubt that existing models for xxxxx have serious drawbacks and a critical rethinking is needed. However, this paper does not advance the state of the art in any way and instead contributes to increase the confusion in this field of research. The paper is very long and it is difficult to follow the argumentation of the authors. In addition, I found almost no original contribution and instead quite a lot of obvious mistakes.
The first impression is that the authors are not familiar with the fundamentals of poromechanics. While xxx contribution is very important, the authors do not even mention the original theory by xxxx The discussion of the origins of Eq. 7 is very confused.I suggest that the authors read also more care-fully the work of Gray and Schrefler. The derivation of Eq. 7 seems to be wrong. I am not sure how the authors arrive to xxxxxxld be the cumulative pore volume up to xxxx not xxxxx.
The discussion of the sxxxx does not go beyond what is found in standard textbooks.!!!!!!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2015-03-13 05:53:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

djl2008d

木虫 (文坛精英)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
还投啥子投，换期刊

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
一定要坚持，坚持就是胜利
2楼2015-03-13 07:21:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 insecrety 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭