| 查看: 430 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
jessica.W新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
谁能帮忙翻译下面这句话的意思,非常感谢哦!
|
|
| “Fig.2c must show individual data points in the impedance spectra and the lines should be of the spectra obtained from fitting to the corresponding equivalent electrical circuit, the values of the parameters being given in the text.”,注:Fig.2C是Nyquist plots。 |
» 猜你喜欢
265求调剂
已经有9人回复
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有20人回复
专硕 351 086100 也是考的材科基 本科也是材料
已经有6人回复
085600专硕材料与化工348分求调剂
已经有10人回复
085600 295分求调剂
已经有21人回复
285求调剂
已经有5人回复
一志愿安徽大学0817化学工程与技术,求调剂
已经有9人回复
一志愿0817化学工程与技术,求调剂
已经有8人回复
271分求调剂学校
已经有3人回复
生物学308分求调剂(一志愿华东师大)
已经有7人回复
ssssllllnnnn
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 翻译EPI: 1690
- 应助: 452 (硕士)
- 金币: 31580.9
- 红花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在线: 19966.6小时
- 虫号: 3328089
- 注册: 2014-07-17
- 专业: 肿瘤发生
2楼2015-03-09 13:22:44
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
3楼2015-03-09 13:49:07
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
4楼2015-03-09 13:51:23
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
|
你好,鉴于您具有如此高的英语水平,能再帮忙翻译下下面这段吗? “ It should be explained clearly why there is a relationship between the change in peak current and the logarithm of the PML/RARA fusion gene segment concentration (see Fig.5) i.e. why it is not linear. Obviously if this is the case there is not a linear range in the normal sense of the word as claimed in Table 1 and the statistical definition of the detection limit is also different. The table heading should make this completely clear.” |
5楼2015-03-09 14:09:36














回复此楼
“ It should be explained clearly why there is a relationship between the change in peak current and the logarithm of the PML/RARA fusion gene segment concentration (see Fig.5) i.e. why it is not linear. Obviously if this is the case there is not a linear range in the normal sense of the word as claimed in Table 1 and the statistical definition of the detection limit is also different. The table heading should make this completely clear.”