| 查看: 368 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
jessica.W新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
谁能帮忙翻译下面这句话的意思,非常感谢哦!
|
|
| “Fig.2c must show individual data points in the impedance spectra and the lines should be of the spectra obtained from fitting to the corresponding equivalent electrical circuit, the values of the parameters being given in the text.”,注:Fig.2C是Nyquist plots。 |
» 猜你喜欢
A期刊撤稿
已经有3人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有34人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
回收溶剂求助
已经有6人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
申请26博士
已经有5人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复,还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
ssssllllnnnn
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 翻译EPI: 1690
- 应助: 452 (硕士)
- 金币: 31580.9
- 红花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在线: 19966.6小时
- 虫号: 3328089
- 注册: 2014-07-17
- 专业: 肿瘤发生
2楼2015-03-09 13:22:44
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
3楼2015-03-09 13:49:07
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
4楼2015-03-09 13:51:23
jessica.W
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 31
- 在线: 11.9小时
- 虫号: 801333
- 注册: 2009-06-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属复合纳米材料
|
你好,鉴于您具有如此高的英语水平,能再帮忙翻译下下面这段吗? “ It should be explained clearly why there is a relationship between the change in peak current and the logarithm of the PML/RARA fusion gene segment concentration (see Fig.5) i.e. why it is not linear. Obviously if this is the case there is not a linear range in the normal sense of the word as claimed in Table 1 and the statistical definition of the detection limit is also different. The table heading should make this completely clear.” |
5楼2015-03-09 14:09:36













回复此楼
“ It should be explained clearly why there is a relationship between the change in peak current and the logarithm of the PML/RARA fusion gene segment concentration (see Fig.5) i.e. why it is not linear. Obviously if this is the case there is not a linear range in the normal sense of the word as claimed in Table 1 and the statistical definition of the detection limit is also different. The table heading should make this completely clear.”