24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2719  |  回复: 6
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wosuoge

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] IEEE GRSL投稿显示(Reject and Resubmit) 已有3人参与

如题,一个月前投的文章,今天收到意见,Reject and Resubmit,让五个月之内返回重投,为啥除了副主编的意见外,怎么就只有一个审稿人啊,另外,最后显示第二个审稿人的意见见附件,但是邮件里没有附件啊,并且我上官网也看不到相应的附件啊,万分感谢,头一次投SCI。
以下是具体回复的意见:

Associate Editor Comments:
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
While the topic and idea of *********** is interesting, there are too many errors in equations, symbols, references, etc. In short, the current manuscript is neither well written nor well organized. Here I strongly recommend authors to do a full scale revision of the manuscript including English editing. In addition, the authors must enhance the experimental results for supporting the performance of the proposed method. Example with two points must not be enough.

Reviewer(s) Comments:
Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The paper proposes a new method for ************ to improve cost time and to keep estimation accuracy.
However, the paper is not well organized and written. It is hard to read and understand the manuscript, especially section III. The authors should try to focus what you found and delete unnecessary equations. I would strongly recommend that the authors re-format and re-write the manuscript to explain the new method.

The experimental results show coherence value and cost time for only two windows. Only two point results can’t be generalized. The authors should show optimized coherence images and some meaning values (e.g. average, variance, histogram…).
There are several errors (English, symbol, formatting, equation, missing reference) in the manuscript.


Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
see attached file
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wosuoge

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by zimupig at 2015-03-09 08:16:00
GOOD LUCK

谢谢
7楼2015-03-09 15:28:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

zbking

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wosuoge: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 非常感谢 2015-03-08 22:27:59
应该是在投稿系统的decision letter的附件里,你可以登录ScholarOne系统,查看文章下面的view decision letter的附件,祝好运。。。
2楼2015-03-08 22:23:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaozhang

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流~ 2015-03-09 09:07:29
wosuoge: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2015-03-09 15:27:44
你先到投稿系统中查一查,也许在那,要是没有,可以给编辑发邮件说明情况。
4楼2015-03-08 22:44:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +11 kulium 2026-08-21 14/700 2026-08-24 02:12 by 流流伤
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +4 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 5/250 2026-08-24 02:09 by 流流伤
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +16 羊腰板 2026-08-21 17/850 2026-08-23 23:02 by tianxiaochun
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +12 大萍1987 2026-08-20 15/750 2026-08-23 20:44 by 大萍1987
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +24 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 26/1300 2026-08-22 17:43 by kammury
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +13 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-22 17:08 by WH3796
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +17 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 18/900 2026-08-21 20:57 by zhangev
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 8/400 2026-08-21 12:31 by 酷酷墨镜
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +5 wwm09 2026-08-17 7/350 2026-08-21 10:11 by 期刊论文帮手
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +3 archvillain 2026-08-18 3/150 2026-08-21 01:48 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见