| 查看: 2407 | 回复: 8 | ||
[求助]
Materials letters 审稿意见回来了
|
|
Dear ...., The reviewer(s) and editor have evaluated your manuscript . As you will see from the comments below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/mlblue/, moderate revision has been requested. Given that the requested revisions are moderate the new version is required within one month (30 days). ......... I hope that you will find these comments to be of use to you and am looking forward to receiving your revision. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Kind regards, Aldo Boccaccini Editor-in-Chief Materials Letters .......................................................... Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided. COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS Reviewer #1: Dear editor: Thank you for inviting me to review this manuscript (.....). The author's investigation focus on the mullite based ceramics proppant fabricated method and its mechanic properties. Their research activity is more interesting and research results are not bad. Therefore, I feel that the paper merits publication in Materials Letter. However, several points are necessary for clarity before publication. 1. The author mentioned that they used the dynamic sintering method to fabricate the proppant. However, the author didn't give more detail description for dynamic sintering method. It is seemly more important to fabricate the low density mullite-based ceramics proppant. So, the author should supply the details for this method. 2. The Fig. 1 not clearly, it is better for author redraw the XRD patterns for the samples and give the reference PDF file of mullite. The caption for Fig. 1 has one mistake, the (a) bauxite calcined at 1300 C, should be calcined at 1200 C. 3. As shown as Fig. 3, the micrographs of proppant fracture section is not clear indicate the difference between two sintering temperature. So, it is better for author supplied the high magnification micrographs of proppant fracture section. The microstructure of proppant made from natural bauxite should be supplied too. 4. page 5, line 7, the author mentioned that: "the reaction between the glass phase and alumina to form secondary mullite is detrimental to the densification. For this reason, a higher breakage ration was observed in B-samples." The conclusion is without enough experimental results support, such as phase analysis and microstructure analysis. 5. Page 6 and line9: the author mentioned that: "compared with A-samples 1355, the bigger pores were observed in A-specimens 1400 (sintering at 1400 C), which may be due to the expansion of gas in the pores in proppants with the increase of sintering temperature", however, here it is missing the direct experiment results too. What kinds gas will be produced at the temperature of 1400C? 是小修还是中修呢?对于审稿意见和修改搞提交的几个疑问。 审稿意见疑问： 对于意见1和2可以完全按照审稿意见修改。对于审稿意见3，。我觉得图片已经能明显反应试样的却别，同时现在的实验检测条件也确实不能做到更高倍数的SEM。我该怎么回复呢。添加另一个试样的sem可以做到，但放大倍数和我之前的一样。对于审稿意见4， "the reaction between the glass phase and alumina to form secondary mullite is detrimental to the densification. ”这句话我是引用别人文章里面的话，这个我该怎么回复呢？对于审稿意见5，可以回答。总体来说，我这个文章可以中吗？ 修改稿疑问： 我直接用Revision Notes来点对点的回复吗？还需要cover letter吗？ 修改后的手稿里面还需要有图片？图片是单独做成文档上传？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
281求调剂（0805）
已经有8人回复
-
环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有10人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
26博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
被我言中：新模板不强调格式了，假专家开始管格式了
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 关于Materials Letters 的，第一关技术审查给返回来了，说是英语不过关，请教大家指点
已经有32人回复
- materials letters审稿意见中不明白地方求解答
已经有7人回复
- 初次投稿materials letters 审稿人给的意见
已经有9人回复
- Materials Letters技术审查求助
已经有16人回复
- materials letters 投稿求助 ！！！！
已经有18人回复
- MATERIALS LETTERS 被拒后能否按照审稿人的意见修改后再次投稿？
已经有25人回复
- 审稿人是major revision，但是Materials Letters拒稿
已经有33人回复
- 请问大家能够给几个materials letters 比较好的审稿人么？
已经有4人回复
- 大家帮忙看看审稿意见
已经有6人回复
- ECM审稿意见返回了，求各位帮忙解读一下，谢谢
已经有28人回复
- Materials Letters投稿一周后返回技术审查意见，不知道怎么修改，求高手指教
已经有8人回复
- 想问下论文被materials letters 接收，但在网上提交了proof，之后还要不要回复邮件？
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮看一下这个审稿意见棘手不，谢谢了。
已经有22人回复
- Materials Letters 让我审稿，该严一点还是松一点？
已经有53人回复
- materials letters 修改求助
已经有3人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- Materials Letters References 格式
已经有3人回复
- Materials Letters投稿快一个月了，至今一直with editor，是怎么回事？
已经有50人回复
- materials letters审稿意见，请虫友帮我看看
已经有7人回复
- IEEE transactions on comsumer electronics 的审稿意见，大家帮我看看
已经有32人回复
- Materials letters 多久送外审？
已经有12人回复
- materials letters投稿
已经有10人回复
- 求助：Materials Letters怎么样？审稿周期长吗？
已经有3人回复
Terminology
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 金币: 6770.5
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 442
- 在线: 287.2小时
- 虫号: 1416857
- 注册: 2011-09-25
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
2楼2015-02-07 10:24:37
3楼2015-02-09 13:57:26
wmywade
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 389
- 散金: 58
- 帖子: 62
- 在线: 76.4小时
- 虫号: 2243134
- 注册: 2013-01-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
4楼2015-02-26 23:50:40
5楼2015-02-27 11:02:28
澹遥
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1818.2
- 帖子: 556
- 在线: 143.8小时
- 虫号: 1835311
- 注册: 2012-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 河流海岸动力学与泥沙研究
6楼2015-02-27 11:31:43
7楼2015-02-27 11:57:22
澹遥
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1818.2
- 帖子: 556
- 在线: 143.8小时
- 虫号: 1835311
- 注册: 2012-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 河流海岸动力学与泥沙研究
8楼2015-02-27 14:09:52
SCI_13
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5254.9
- 散金: 31
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 1694
- 在线: 292.8小时
- 虫号: 3701645
- 注册: 2015-02-28
- 专业: 碳素材料与超硬材料
9楼2017-02-07 16:00:13
5