| ²é¿´: 983 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
jiayou201101½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Çë°ïæÐÞ¸ÄÒ»¾äÓ¢ÎÄ Ð»Ð»
|
||
| It is clearly seen that the effective distribution coefficient of Mg2+ ion increases with the increasing MgO concentration in the melts, and it is close to one, indicating that In distributes uniformly in crystal. It can be further seen from Fig. 1 that the effective distribution coefficient of Fe3+ and Zr4+ ions decreases as the doping concentration of Mg2+ increases in the melts. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
085602µ÷¼Á ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
302·Ö 085601Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶(0856) 339·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
085410È˹¤ÖÇÄÜ ³õÊÔ316·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
282Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
315Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
mac194
Ìú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 61
- Ó¦Öú: 128 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 21401.3
- ºì»¨: 101
- Ìû×Ó: 3332
- ÔÚÏß: 3370.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2488597
- ×¢²á: 2013-05-30
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϵļӹ¤Óë³ÉÐÍ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:22
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:22
|
[ ΪÁË·þÎñ´óÖÚ, ϸ½ effective distribution coefficient = Ke ¶¨Òå ] [ https://books.google.com/books?i ... ion&f=false ] [ Çë½Ì: Ke = [¹ÌÌåÄÚŨ¶È] / [ÈÜÒºÄÚŨ¶È] ¼ÙÉè "melt" = "ÈÜÒº", ΪʲôÄã˵ the effective distribution coefficient of Mg2+ ion increases with the increasing MgO concentration in the melts ] ÂÛÔ¾ä: The effective distribution coefficient of Mg2+ ion increases with MgO concentration [rising] in the melt As distribution of Mg2+ becomes more uniform in the crystal, its effective distribution coefficient approaches unity Fig 1 shows how the effective distribution coefficients of Fe3+ and Zr4+ ions diminish with Mg2+ dopant concentration rising in the melt ------------------- effective distribution coefficient ¶¨Òå.jpg |
3Â¥2015-01-30 09:27:08
ssssllllnnnn
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
Translator and Proofreader
- ·ÒëEPI: 1690
- Ó¦Öú: 452 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 31580.9
- ºì»¨: 100
- Ìû×Ó: 7681
- ÔÚÏß: 19966.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3328089
- ×¢²á: 2014-07-17
- רҵ: Ö×Áö·¢Éú
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
É̼ÒÒѾÖ÷¶¯ÉùÃ÷´Ë»ØÌû¿ÉÄܺ¬ÓÐÐû´«ÄÚÈÝ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+10, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:36
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+10, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:36
|
It is clearly seen that the effective distribution coefficient of Mg2+ ion increases with the increasing MgO concentration in the melts, ¡¾with the maximum close to one¡¿, indicating that ¡¾it¡¿ distributes uniformly in crystal. It can be further seen from Fig. 1 that the effective distribution coefficient of Fe3+ and Zr4+ ions decreases as the doping concentration of Mg2+ increases in the melts. ¡¾¡¿Ïµ¸Ä¹ýµÄµØ·½ |
2Â¥2015-01-30 03:38:56
mac194
Ìú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 61
- Ó¦Öú: 128 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 21401.3
- ºì»¨: 101
- Ìû×Ó: 3332
- ÔÚÏß: 3370.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2488597
- ×¢²á: 2013-05-30
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϵļӹ¤Óë³ÉÐÍ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
ÉÙÓôúÃû´Ê it ³ý·ÇÏñÉÏÃæÄÇÑù, Ã÷ÏÔµÄÖØ¸´, ²»Ò×»ìÏý ×¢ÒâÓõ¥Êý melt, ·Ç¸´Êý melts "X increase with Y" ±íʾ X ºÍ Y ³ÉÕý±È, X Ëæ YÔö¸ß ¶øÔö¸ß, ÖÐÓ¢ÎÄÒ»Ñù,¶¼²»ÐèÖØ¸´Óà "Ôö¸ß", ËùÒÔµÚÒ»¾äÖÐµÄ [rising] ¿ÉÓпÉÎÞ, ÓÐÔò¸ø¶ÁÕß×öÐÄÀí×¼±¸,ʹµÚÈý¾ä¸üÒ×¶ÁЩ |
4Â¥2015-01-30 09:55:17
²é¿´×¨Òµ»§
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- ·ÒëEPI: 16
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 902.6
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 155
- ÔÚÏß: 49.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2343789
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϵļӹ¤Óë³ÉÐÍ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:44
jiayou201101: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-01-30 20:56:44
| It is clear that with the increasing of the MgO concentration, Effective distribution coefficient of Mg2+ increases; which indicate it distributes uniformly in crystal . It can be further seen form fig ,while the effective distribution coefficient of Fe3+ and Zr4+ions decrease, the doping concentration of Mg2+ increases . |

5Â¥2015-01-30 15:17:54














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥