| 查看: 2765 | 回复: 5 | ||
bluepig1983金虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
如何知道自己投稿是否上了黑名单？
|
|
大家好，我是一位新的科研人员，没什么投稿经验。目前我担心编辑把我放入作者（或稿件）的黑名单。 具体情况是这样：最近我投给Energy Policy的两篇文章都被拒了。其中第二篇是第一篇改了名字和语言后重投的。编辑说我的两篇稿子都存在使用别人文本而没有注明的问题（我并不同意他们的意见，他们也不提供查重报告），而我在第二篇稿子的cover letter里对第一篇稿子的文字重复理由的说明，他们也不予接受。就这样他们就不再让我投这篇稿子了。 请问难道我的科研生涯就这么夭折了吗？谁能告诉我，哪里能够知道我是否被列入到黑名单了？如果是，如何申诉？如果没有，我另投他稿是否会有影响？ 谢谢了 以下我把两篇文章编辑的拒稿意见都列出来了： 第一稿的： Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Energy Policy. Based on a preliminary editorial review, it is the opinion of the Editors that your manuscript does not meet the requirements for sending this manuscript out for peer review in Energy Policy. Those requirements are discussed in the Guide for Authors found on the journal website. We hope that this decision will ultimately hasten the consideration of your work by Energy Policy or another journal. We are grateful to you for your interest, and hope you will continue to consider Energy Policy for future submissions. ---------------------------------------------------------- Editors' comments: It is the policy of Energy Policy to publish new and original work. Text copied from works by third parties or previously published work, even in an introduction, should never be used without clearly identifying the other source (either by quotations or indentations). Every paper should present some novel and new results in the form of a unique paper written in an author's own words. Unless a legitimate explanation is received for the large amount of textual overlap between the submitted paper and other work(s), this paper will not be reconsidered for publication. We further inform you that Energy Policy uses CrossCheck powered by iThenticate software to check the originality of the manuscripts. 第二稿的： Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Energy Policy. Based on a preliminary editorial review, it is the opinion of the Editors that your manuscript does not meet the requirements for sending this manuscript out for peer review in Energy Policy. Those requirements are discussed in the Guide for Authors found on the journal website. We hope that this decision will ultimately hasten the consideration of your work by Energy Policy or another journal. We are grateful to you for your interest, and hope you will continue to consider Energy Policy for future submissions. ---------------------------------------------------------- Editors' comments: Editor's Note: The excuse offered for the textual overlap is not acceptable even though you have now corrected the submission for this. Text copied from works by third parties or previously published work, even in an introduction, should never be used without clearly identifying the other source (either by quotations or indentations). Therefore, the paper is being rejected. Please do not re-submit. Thank you. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
IJCA是否进入EI黑名单?
已经有10人回复
- 稿件被告知某位作者被加入黑名单而不予审稿
已经有37人回复
- IET论文被拒了，该如何是好
已经有25人回复
- 投SCI两天后被拒，大神帮我分析下是什么原因
已经有23人回复
- 如何知道某个期刊是否被SCI收录
已经有5人回复
- 请问acs下期刊审稿人是否会知道投稿人的姓名？
已经有5人回复
- 《传感器与微系统》有增刊吗？怎么样才能知道自己录用的文章是被正刊录用？
已经有4人回复
- 第一次投稿，等了一个半月，有了回复意见，不知道这意味着什么？
已经有21人回复
- 在sciendirect数据库内（在Elsevier）的文章，怎么知道是否被检索哪？
已经有5人回复
- 文章接收后，又被拒了！会被列入黑名单吗？
已经有22人回复
- 毕业论文写了某大公司丑闻，内容是综合网上信息汇整的，被他们知道了会不会告我？
已经有26人回复
- 如何知道要投稿的期刊的等级
已经有17人回复
- 投稿编辑回信，哪位知道什么意思？急！
已经有13人回复
- 如何知道一个杂志是否被SCI收录
已经有8人回复
- 跪求solid state phenomena ISSN:1012-0394 投稿指南！不知道如何投稿，急！！
已经有3人回复
- 请问这是否是上了黑名单？有何补救方法？
已经有17人回复
- 如何知道自己专业都有哪些期刊？期刊级别？
已经有16人回复
- 投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？
已经有6人回复
- 网传南理工3名教师因抄袭被列入国外期刊黑名单
已经有13人回复
- 期刊是不是有黑名单神马的？呵呵
已经有4人回复
- 如何知道一个国际期刊是SCI 还是SCIE?
已经有10人回复
2楼2014-12-22 18:36:41
3楼2014-12-22 18:56:35
yangwg8088
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 503 (博士)
- 金币: 12413
- 散金: 184
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 2421
- 在线: 736.2小时
- 虫号: 2419974
- 注册: 2013-04-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 常微分方程与动力系统
4楼2014-12-22 20:23:05
gxy5669777
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 5895
- 散金: 2962
- 红花: 39
- 帖子: 755
- 在线: 557.7小时
- 虫号: 1835567
- 注册: 2012-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 管理复杂性研究
5楼2014-12-22 20:38:16
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2014-12-22 20:56:46
50