| ²é¿´: 1719 | »Ø¸´: 10 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
ljq158ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ͶWILEYÆÚÏÂÒ»¸öÔÓÖ¾£¬40Ììºó±»¾ÜÖØÍ¶»ú»áÓжà´ó£¿ ÒÑÓÐ4È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
ͶÁ˸öWILEYÆÚÏÂ2.¼¸µÄÔÓÖ¾£¬Éó¸å40Ìì·µ»ØÒâ¼û£¬Ö÷±àºÍ¸±Ö÷±à¸øÁËÖØÍ¶µÄ»ú»á£¬ÎÊÎʸ÷λ´óϺÕâÑùµÄ»ú»áÓжà´ó£¿ÌرðµÚÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÓе㵣ÐÄ¡£ÒÔÏÂÊÇÖ÷±àÀ´ÐźÍÉó¸åÒâ¼û£º Dear Dr.XXX: Manuscript ID: XXX entitled "XXXXX" which you submitted to the Journal of XX has been reviewed. In view of the criticisms of the reviewers, I regret to inform you that I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Journal of XX. The comments of the reviewers are enclosed at the bottom of this message or attached to this email. However, a strongly revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the reviewers will be reconsidered for publication. If you choose to do this, please submit your re-worked manuscript as a new paper at http://XXXXXXX in your Submitting Author Center Please indicate the number of THIS paper (ID: XXX) in the field "previous Submission" in step 5 of the submission process. Please note that submitting your re-worked manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of XX. I look forward to receiving your re-worked submission Best regards, Dr. XXX(Ö÷±à) Editor-in-Chief, Journal of XXX fsvec@lbl.gov Referee(s)' and Associate Editors Comments to Author : Reviewer: 1 In this paper, the author developed a ¡¡It seemed very useful. While I thought the paper was not novel in the separation science or analytical method. May be the author didn¡¯t express their novelty in the present manuscript. I thought the author should focus on the build of on-line system and the automatic was how to be performed. Thus, the paper is potentially suitable for publication in Journal OF XX after being reorganized. Reviewer: 2 This manuscript described a ¡¡, which is useful and validated. However, there are some questions should be paid attention to as follow. 1£® ¡¡ 2£® ¡¡ 3£® ¡¡ 4£® ¡¡ 5£® ¡¡ ÒÔÉÏÊÇ5¸öСÎÊÌâ¡£ Associate Editor(¸±Ö÷±à) Please revise your manuscript carefully according to the comments from reviewers, and then resubmit. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
ר˶ 351 086100 Ò²ÊÇ¿¼µÄ²Ä¿Æ»ù ±¾¿ÆÒ²ÊDzÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600ר˶²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤348·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085600 295·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
271·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ljq158
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 227 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 19221.1
- É¢½ð: 2519
- ºì»¨: 42
- Ìû×Ó: 6716
- ÔÚÏß: 2089Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1681876
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-11
- רҵ: »¯¹¤ÏµÍ³¹¤³Ì
9Â¥2014-12-20 15:03:13
ÔÚ±ÈÓ÷ÈÕÄê
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
´çÀíÀ³µÂ
- Ó¦Öú: 116 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 21066.9
- É¢½ð: 146
- ºì»¨: 8
- Ìû×Ó: 3517
- ÔÚÏß: 231.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2662169
- ×¢²á: 2013-09-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϽṹÓëÐÔÄÜ

2Â¥2014-12-20 09:29:11
ljq158
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 227 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 19221.1
- É¢½ð: 2519
- ºì»¨: 42
- Ìû×Ó: 6716
- ÔÚÏß: 2089Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1681876
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-11
- רҵ: »¯¹¤ÏµÍ³¹¤³Ì
3Â¥2014-12-20 09:38:26
sdcavell
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 95 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9470.2
- É¢½ð: 1717
- ºì»¨: 14
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 3965
- ÔÚÏß: 506.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2203061
- ×¢²á: 2012-12-24
- רҵ: ģʽʶ±ð

4Â¥2014-12-20 10:04:16














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥