| 查看: 5183 | 回复: 29 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
这样的审稿意见，文章还有必要修改么 已有23人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer 1's Comments: 1. No contribution 2. The previous works are not got involved sufficiency. 3. The real design should be given 4. The comparison should be stated. Reviewer 2's Comments: The paper is not written comprehenssive manner. It has many grammetical errors. There is no match between simulated and measurements. Reviewer 3's Comments: 1. This paper is based on the author's previous work compact CPW-Fed antenna printed on a single layer inexpensive FR4 substrate. However, the author did not provide main physical analysis why they proposed to use such FR4 substrate other than inexpensive reason. 2. The author should provide more detain how the author use optimization to obtain the proper size of each element. 3. Comparison between the proposed work with their previous should be demonstrated and outlined the significant difference among the proposed work and others. Reviewer 4's Comments: The authors need to improve the gramma of the submitted manuscript. Technically, I also cannot recommend the publication of this paper with its current writing. The CPW fed UWB folded antenna has been discussed a lot. The contribution of the proposed topology by loading stubs along the feeds is not significant. Actually, some descriptions sound wrong technically. Four types of loading stubs are discussed, however, the second and third are exactly the same. The authors claimed that the loaded inductance will be increased for the first one, which is not correct. Because, if two shunt stubs are connected in parallel, the inductance will be reduced by half. Also, the quality of the figure drawing needs to be improved. On the other hand, I would like to suggest the authors to study the parasitic effects of this structures, which can help to understand the working principle of this monopole type antenna. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中科院海洋所招收海洋材料相关领域博士研究生及研究助理
已经有4人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有3人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有7人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有14人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
入职后第一次管课题组的专利缴费，对账才发现官费比别人多掏了一倍
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
没胡子的猫
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1235.9
- 散金: 2815
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 446
- 在线: 112.1小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2011-11-02
- 专业: 原子簇化学
27楼2014-10-15 16:31:40
2楼2014-10-13 14:57:53
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2014-10-13 19:34:24
flowerrainhm
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 121 (高中生)
- 金币: 1306.7
- 散金: 225
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 823
- 在线: 87.8小时
- 虫号: 3062999
- 注册: 2014-03-17
- 专业: 物理海洋学
4楼2014-10-13 20:57:58
10