| 查看: 501 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价6次，作者armea增加金币 3.75 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[资源]
The National Science Foundation's Materials Research Science
|
||
|
The National Science Foundation's Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program PAPERBACK ISBN-10: 0-309-10961-2 ISBN-13: 978-0-309- The MRSEC Impact Assessment Committee was convened by the National Research Council in response to an informal request from the National Science Foundation. Charged to examine the impact of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers program (MRSEC program) and to provide guidance for the future (see Appendix A), the committee included experts from across materials research as well as several from outside the ield (see Appendix G for biographical sketches of the committee members). The committee describes its analysis in this report at three different levels of detail in order to make the analysis accessible to the broadest possible audience. The Executive Summary provides a brief summary of the report. The Overview describes the complete chain of reasoning and includes all of the indings, conclu- sions, and recommendations. Chapters 1 through 6 then present detailed discus- sions and evidence. In preparing its report, the committee found it necessary to distinguish among three types of key statements. All appear in boldface within this report but are to be distinguished as follows: * General inding: A nontrivial observation that, in the committee’s judgment, arises from the evidence examined in the course of its work. These general indings express general principles that are not unique to the MRSEC pro- gram performance and impact assessment. * Conclusion: A nontrivial observation that the committee derived during its work that pertains directly to the MRSEC program’s performance and impact assessment. * Recommendation: An action item assigned to speciic entities that the com- mittee believes will enhance the future performance and impact of the MRSEC program for materials research. The committee thanks its generous hosts at each of its site visits (Boston University, California Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Michigan State University, University of California at San Diego, University of California at Santa Barbara, University of Florida, University of Michigan, University of Southern California, and University of Southern Mis- sissippi); these half-day meetings were an invaluable data-gathering tool for the committee. The warm hospitality provided an environment for frank discussion and insightful suggestions that contributed to the committee’s understanding of the issues. At each of its meetings, many invited experts gave testimony on their experiences working in materials research (see Appendix B). The committee greatly appreciates the time and effort that these individuals put into preparing their remarks. The committee gratefully acknowledges the thoughtful and very helpful par- ticipation of the staff from the National Research Council’s Board on Science Edu- cation, including Jean Moon, Andrew Shouse, and Yan Liu. These experts helped the committee to collect and analyze data on the education and outreach activities at Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers as well as understand the frontiers of research in science education. The National Science Foundations Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program.pdf [ Last edited by armea on 2008-4-15 at 15:41 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有49人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有21人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有8人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有10人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
4楼2008-04-19 09:36:14
