| 查看: 450 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价6次,作者armea增加金币 3.75 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[资源]
The National Science Foundation's Materials Research Science
|
||
|
The National Science Foundation's Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program PAPERBACK ISBN-10: 0-309-10961-2 ISBN-13: 978-0-309- The MRSEC Impact Assessment Committee was convened by the National Research Council in response to an informal request from the National Science Foundation. Charged to examine the impact of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers program (MRSEC program) and to provide guidance for the future (see Appendix A), the committee included experts from across materials research as well as several from outside the ield (see Appendix G for biographical sketches of the committee members). The committee describes its analysis in this report at three different levels of detail in order to make the analysis accessible to the broadest possible audience. The Executive Summary provides a brief summary of the report. The Overview describes the complete chain of reasoning and includes all of the indings, conclu- sions, and recommendations. Chapters 1 through 6 then present detailed discus- sions and evidence. In preparing its report, the committee found it necessary to distinguish among three types of key statements. All appear in boldface within this report but are to be distinguished as follows: * General inding: A nontrivial observation that, in the committee’s judgment, arises from the evidence examined in the course of its work. These general indings express general principles that are not unique to the MRSEC pro- gram performance and impact assessment. * Conclusion: A nontrivial observation that the committee derived during its work that pertains directly to the MRSEC program’s performance and impact assessment. * Recommendation: An action item assigned to speciic entities that the com- mittee believes will enhance the future performance and impact of the MRSEC program for materials research. The committee thanks its generous hosts at each of its site visits (Boston University, California Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Michigan State University, University of California at San Diego, University of California at Santa Barbara, University of Florida, University of Michigan, University of Southern California, and University of Southern Mis- sissippi); these half-day meetings were an invaluable data-gathering tool for the committee. The warm hospitality provided an environment for frank discussion and insightful suggestions that contributed to the committee’s understanding of the issues. At each of its meetings, many invited experts gave testimony on their experiences working in materials research (see Appendix B). The committee greatly appreciates the time and effort that these individuals put into preparing their remarks. The committee gratefully acknowledges the thoughtful and very helpful par- ticipation of the staff from the National Research Council’s Board on Science Edu- cation, including Jean Moon, Andrew Shouse, and Yan Liu. These experts helped the committee to collect and analyze data on the education and outreach activities at Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers as well as understand the frontiers of research in science education. The National Science Foundations Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program.pdf [ Last edited by armea on 2008-4-15 at 15:41 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有7人回复
26申博
已经有3人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有22人回复
最失望的一年
已经有4人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有19人回复
请教限项目规定
已经有3人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有10人回复
基金申报
已经有6人回复
推荐一本书
已经有13人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
4楼2008-04-19 09:36:14
2楼2008-04-18 12:53:03
3楼2008-04-19 09:21:55













回复此楼
