24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1902  |  回复: 35
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

passme1979

新虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 论文被拒,请大侠帮着分析可否修改重投?

审稿意见如下:
Dear Dr. liu,
We have carefully studied comments from our reviewers concerning your paper. Although we fully appreciate the time and effort you have put into this paper, we are unable to reach a conclusion to accept the paper in its present form for publication in Soils and Foundations.
Your paper would be reviewed again as a newly submitted paper if you rewrite the paper by cosidering the following reviewer's comments to the extent satisfactory to our committee. When and if you submit a revised version of the paper, please quote the present paper number.   
We sincerely hope, however, that the decision will not terminate your interest in our journal, and that we will have opportunities to be of service in the future.


上述审稿意见说文章需要深入分析,鼓励修改补充后重新投稿,请问各位大虾有必要吗?是不是出版社的客套话呢?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

herring1984

木虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该就是修改后重投吧,如果直接拒的话,编辑会明确说明不认为你能够修改好的。
30楼2014-08-22 11:03:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 36 个回答

yangwg8088

铜虫 (著名写手)



passme1979(金币+1): 谢谢参与
很有必要。否则就直接据稿了

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
5楼2014-08-21 21:40:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuanyeguhong

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



passme1979(金币+1): 谢谢参与
添人气的!
8楼2014-08-21 21:52:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

passme1979

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by yangwg8088 at 2014-08-21 21:40:40
很有必要。否则就直接据稿了

它最后的结论是拒稿啊,感觉说的像是客套话。
12楼2014-08-21 21:56:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
yuguiyan2楼
2014-08-21 21:36   回复  
passme1979(金币+1): 谢谢参与
[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
mvpyqz11楼
2014-08-21 21:54   回复  
passme1979(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见