24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3783  |  回复: 13

nicai88

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] PLOS one 提问,是被拒的前奏吗? 已有6人参与

各位大侠,生平第一次投稿,投稿一周收到邮件如下,平安夜辗转难眠,不知道怎么会有这么多的意见,是不是被拒的节奏哈?还请各路大侠帮我分析一下啊,圣诞节修改文章,这些都要补充到文章里面吗?还是要补一份说明报告就可以呢?谢谢!

> At this stage, we would request you report additional details relating to the in vivo experiments described in your submission, particularly the survival study:
> 1. Please specify whether the rats died as a direct result of the experimental procedures, or whether humane endpoints were used during the survival study (i.e., the animals were humanely euthanized when they met certain clinical criteria)
> a. If humane endpoints were used, please specify the criteria used to determine when the animals should be humanely euthanized
> b. Please specify how frequently the condition of the animals was monitored
> 2. Please specify the method of sacrifice used for each experiment
> 3. Please provide details of any steps taken to minimize suffering of the rats, including analgesics and anaesthetics, for each experiment
> 4. Please follow the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal studies (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357)
>
>
> Your manuscript has been returned to your account. Please log on to PLOS Editorial Manager at http://pone.edmgr.com/ to access your manuscript.
>
> Your manuscript can be found in the "Submissions Sent Back to Author" link under the New Submissions menu. After you have made the changes requested above, please be sure to view and approve the revised PDF after rebuilding the PDF to complete the resubmission process.
>
> Please note that these changes have been requested to comply with submission guidelines and your manuscript will *not* be sent to review until you have fully adhered to our requests. Once your paper has been seen by an Editor we may return it to you for further information or amendments.
>
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文发表

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
叫你修改后再投稿.修改让editor满意了,就可送审
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
2楼2013-12-25 10:00:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nicai88

金虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by ziyeweng at 2013-12-25 10:00:46
叫你修改后再投稿.修改让editor满意了,就可送审

谢谢,对这些意见我不知道怎么修才好,能具体说说嘛?
3楼2013-12-25 10:15:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

v.chit

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
就是你的动物实验描述得不够详细或不规范,不符合动物福利或者实验伦理学。你参考他的要求修改后,重新上传~
4楼2013-12-25 13:13:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

babero

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主多虑了,这是PLoS ONE期刊任何文章投稿必须提交的伦理说明。
不知道你文章的具体情况,所用材料是植物还是动物?
5楼2013-12-25 13:38:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nicai88

金虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by babero at 2013-12-25 13:38:19
楼主多虑了,这是PLoS ONE期刊任何文章投稿必须提交的伦理说明。
不知道你文章的具体情况,所用材料是植物还是动物?

我用的是动物,这个是提供伦理说明就行吗?还是修改文章后重新提交?
6楼2013-12-25 15:24:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

洗头革面

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
你这种情况很常见的,按他的意见一条一条改,你可以的。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
7楼2013-12-25 15:41:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fwq19890304

禁虫 (小有名气)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

8楼2013-12-25 15:48:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nicai88

金虫 (小有名气)

内容已删除
9楼2013-12-25 15:49:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

babero

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by nicai88 at 2013-12-25 15:24:18
我用的是动物,这个是提供伦理说明就行吗?还是修改文章后重新提交?...

你刚投稿吧,应该是人家技术审查的时候查出来你在文章里没有陈述。你看看投稿系统文章是不是退回来让重新投?
10楼2013-12-25 16:12:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 nicai88 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见