24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1229  |  回复: 2

bamulanglang

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 审稿意见返回,大修,虫友看看还有戏没已有1人参与

本人第一次投SCI,水平不高投的Sensors,3周返回审稿意见,3个审稿人意见如下:

Reviewer_1  Comments:

I have some criticisms about the work and these are as follows:
1. Many references, [18]-[27], are not ticked in the main body of the paper. Some typos errors can be found in the paper.
2. I can find similar work presented in some other papers. The author(s) should strengthen the novelty of this paper, both in theoretical and experimental sections.
3. The author(s) didn’t give out the geometric parameters used for the simulation.
4. Some experimental results are not good. For example, in Fig. 15, there is a significant defect in the vibration mode, but the author didn’t explain it. More likely it is a measurement error. 实验结果不好。

1. 有些参考文献没在正文中标出。
2. 加强新颖性。
3. 仿真参数给的少。
4. 实验结果不好。

Reviewer_2  Comments:

This paper should not be published for the comments listed under mandatory.  At best, the reported results are preliminary and publication should await reporting real per-formance data such as bias and bias hysteresis over temperature.
Mandatory Comments:
1.  Thirty years ago, ** reported ##.  In recent years, *** have reported on ###.  The reported work is similar and offers nothing new.
2.  Details of the proposed sensor are scant.  Given the many commercial and university grade gyroscopes, the authors should tell why this unit is expected to replace any of the existing rate sensors.  Impact survival was mentioned.  Any others?  How large is it?  Because of hysteresis and losses, metals and PZT have lead to historically poor sensors.  Why should this be different?  How did you decide where to place the balancing mass?
3.  What is quality of an added mass?  I am unfamiliar with this term.
4.  The text says Figure 8 shows stress and displacements for the impact load. The figure is labeled schematic of working principle and the individual plots are labeled modal solutions. In what direction was the acceleration applied.
Optional Comments :
5.  Why undertake another gyro?

貌似直接拒:
强制性评论:
1. 没有新东西。
2. 缺乏详细信息;有什么优点使其取代现有传感器;历史证明这种传感器性能差,你这个有什么区别;。。
3. 质量块的质量。。怎么翻译啊。。。
4. 完全不知道他在说什么,不是我论文中的东西,估计他看串了吧。。这怎么回答。。。。。
可选择的评论:
5. 没看懂。。。

Reviewer_3
导师认识的国内老师,给了小修

编辑给了大修,审稿人评价很差啊,不知道有戏没。。。给点意见。。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll550

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
bamulanglang(秋天白云代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流! 2014-07-25 23:25:39
如果整体修改,机会很小,因为有个硬伤就是novelty,这东西人家觉得别人做过了

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
livelong
2楼2014-07-24 18:31:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jielianchang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

这个期刊很贵吧
3楼2014-07-25 22:50:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 bamulanglang 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见