| 查看: 1228 | 回复: 2 | ||
bamulanglang新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
审稿意见返回,大修,虫友看看还有戏没已有1人参与
|
|
本人第一次投SCI,水平不高投的Sensors,3周返回审稿意见,3个审稿人意见如下: Reviewer_1 Comments: I have some criticisms about the work and these are as follows: 1. Many references, [18]-[27], are not ticked in the main body of the paper. Some typos errors can be found in the paper. 2. I can find similar work presented in some other papers. The author(s) should strengthen the novelty of this paper, both in theoretical and experimental sections. 3. The author(s) didn’t give out the geometric parameters used for the simulation. 4. Some experimental results are not good. For example, in Fig. 15, there is a significant defect in the vibration mode, but the author didn’t explain it. More likely it is a measurement error. 实验结果不好。 1. 有些参考文献没在正文中标出。 2. 加强新颖性。 3. 仿真参数给的少。 4. 实验结果不好。 Reviewer_2 Comments: This paper should not be published for the comments listed under mandatory. At best, the reported results are preliminary and publication should await reporting real per-formance data such as bias and bias hysteresis over temperature. Mandatory Comments: 1. Thirty years ago, ** reported ##. In recent years, *** have reported on ###. The reported work is similar and offers nothing new. 2. Details of the proposed sensor are scant. Given the many commercial and university grade gyroscopes, the authors should tell why this unit is expected to replace any of the existing rate sensors. Impact survival was mentioned. Any others? How large is it? Because of hysteresis and losses, metals and PZT have lead to historically poor sensors. Why should this be different? How did you decide where to place the balancing mass? 3. What is quality of an added mass? I am unfamiliar with this term. 4. The text says Figure 8 shows stress and displacements for the impact load. The figure is labeled schematic of working principle and the individual plots are labeled modal solutions. In what direction was the acceleration applied. Optional Comments : 5. Why undertake another gyro? 貌似直接拒: 强制性评论: 1. 没有新东西。 2. 缺乏详细信息;有什么优点使其取代现有传感器;历史证明这种传感器性能差,你这个有什么区别;。。 3. 质量块的质量。。怎么翻译啊。。。 4. 完全不知道他在说什么,不是我论文中的东西,估计他看串了吧。。这怎么回答。。。。。 可选择的评论: 5. 没看懂。。。 Reviewer_3 导师认识的国内老师,给了小修 编辑给了大修,审稿人评价很差啊,不知道有戏没。。。给点意见。。 |
» 猜你喜欢
到新单位后,换了新的研究方向,没有团队,持续积累2区以上论文,能申请到面上吗
已经有7人回复
申请2026年博士
已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有5人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有6人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有6人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
ll550
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 259 (大学生)
- 金币: 4586.3
- 散金: 230
- 红花: 34
- 帖子: 3331
- 在线: 767小时
- 虫号: 3180771
- 注册: 2014-05-05
- 专业: 马、恩、列、斯思想研究

2楼2014-07-24 18:31:22
jielianchang
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 25 (小学生)
- 金币: 10662.3
- 散金: 56
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 1853
- 在线: 627.8小时
- 虫号: 1488306
- 注册: 2011-11-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 导航、制导与传感技术
3楼2014-07-25 22:50:25













回复此楼