| 查看: 1672 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
有关审稿人的问题 已有2人参与
|
||
|
最近投了篇talanta, 关于审稿人的意见有些弄不明白，请各位虫友帮忙分析一下： 1. The aims of the work are not well described in the abstract and I would like to suggest to the authors that they modify the text in order to present in a clear way the objectives of the research. 2. In the experimental section, details about the characterization of the Ag NCs particles using TEM technique are absent. I recommend the authors insert these details. 3. In my opinion, the quality of the figures is good. I suggest the authors that they improve the presentation of the figures, mainly the plots. 谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有13人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有4人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有24人回复
-
免疫学博士有名额，速联系
已经有14人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有4人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
匿名
用户注销 (著名写手)
- 应助: 67 (初中生)
- 金币: 3542.3
- 散金: 356
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1213
- 在线: 1556.4小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2008-05-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
11楼2014-07-23 08:30:28
2楼2014-07-21 10:58:37
greeneese
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 78 (初中生)
- 金币: 10017.5
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 744
- 在线: 386.3小时
- 虫号: 467093
- 注册: 2007-11-25
- 专业: 生化分析及生物传感
3楼2014-07-21 12:04:42
|
谢谢，非常感谢。还有个问题，是另一个审稿人的。关于参考文献：The references are not cited in a right chronological sequence e.g.refs.[1-5] ref. no. 1 in 2006, ref. no. 2 in 1997, ref. no. 3 in 2004, ref. no. 4 in 2006 then ref. no. 5 in 2003. This is always by all citations and should be corrected. There are some irrelevant reference which can be omitted without affecting the scientific merit of the paper. 难道他的意思是说一处引用的参考文献要按年代序排列起来？但是我看了talanta的一些文章，并没有按年代序排列啊？ |
4楼2014-07-21 12:06:38