| ²é¿´: 1362 | »Ø¸´: 6 | ||
ktootkͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ElsevierµÄÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åºó±à¼ËµÃ»ÓзûºÏ±ê×¼µÄScholarship£¬±»¾Ü¸åÁË£¬Ê²Ã´Òâ˼¡£¡£¡£
|
|
ElsevierµÄLUPÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åºó±à¼ËµÎÒµÄÎÄÕºܺÃÈÃËû¶úĿһУ¬»¹ÈÃÎÒ¸Ä˵ºÃÏ£ÍûÔÙ¼ûµ½ÎÒͶËûÃÇ£¬ ÓÚÊÇÐÀÈ»¸ÄÍêÔÙͶ£¬Õâ»ØËµÎÒûÓзûºÏ±ê×¼µÄScholarship£¬½á¹û³¹µ×±»¾Ü¸åÁË£¬Ê²Ã´Òâ˼£¬Ö®Ç°ËµÎÄÕ°ôÐÀÉÍÎÒ£¬¸ÄºÃÈ´ÒòΪScholarship¾Í¾Ü¸åÁË¡£¡£¡£ Scholarship£¿£¿£¿Õâ¶«Î÷µ±Ê²Ã´½²°¡ÎÒÔΡ£¡£¡£ ![]() ÏÂÃæÎÒ°ÑÔ»°·¢¹ýÀ´£¬Ë¿´¿´Scholarshipµ±Ê²Ã´½²°¡£¬ËµºÃµÄÐÞ¸ÄÄØÔõô»á¾Ü¸å°¡£º ![]() While your study topic fits within the aims and scope of our journal, the quality of the scholarship does not meet the standards we require in order to send it out for a full peer review. Therefore I must reject it at this initial stage of review. The peer review process places high demands upon experts in the field, and for an international journal such as ours we must be very selective in imposing upon reviewers who give freely of their time. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703Çóµ÷¼Á383·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧ085600Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ337·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
085600£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á325·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085600£¬321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§357·Ö£¬¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ£¬085600£¬344·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
elsevier³ö°æÉçÆìÏÂÆÚ¿¯½ÓÊÕÁËһƪÎÄÕ£¬°ë¸ö¶àÔÂÁË»¹Ã»ÊÕµ½°æÈ¨ÐÒé
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åElsevierÆÚ¿¯£¬±à¼»ØÓʼþÁË£¬Óв»Ã÷°×µÄµØ·½£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´~
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Elsevier¹«Ë¾×î½ü¼¸Äê³ö°æµÄÆÚ¿¯Ëƺõ¶¼×¢Ë®ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ͷelsevier µÄһЩÆÚ¿¯µÄ»ù±¾ÎÊÌâ,ÇëºÃÈËÐľÙÊÖÏàÖú.
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÖÁElsevier³ö°æÉçÆÚ¿¯µÄ³æ×ÓÃÇҪСÐÄÁË~~
ÒѾÓÐ52È˻ظ´
ElsevierÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åÏµÍ³ÍøËÙºÜÂý°¡
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕÂûËÍÉó¾Í±»¾Ü£¬ËµÊDz»·ûºÏ¿¯ÎïÒªÇ󣬱༽¨ÒéÁËÁ½¸öÆÚ¿¯£¬Ôõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Çë½Ì¸÷λ³æÓÑelsevierÖÐµÄÆÚ¿¯Ò³ÊýÒªÇóɶÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊÔÚElsevierÒ»ÆÚ¿¯±»Â¼Óú󵽷¢±íǰ×÷Õ߸Ã×öЩʲô?
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
ͶÁËelsevierµÄÒ»¸öÆÚ¿¯,Òªmajor revision,Ð޸ĺó½ÓÊܵĸÅÂÊ?
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ͶelsevierµÄÆÚ¿¯±»¾Ü£¬ÖØÍ¶ACSµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬ÐèÒªÔÚcover letterÀï֮ǰµÄͶ¸å¾ÀúÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ48È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊElsevierÆìÏÂÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åµÄʱºò×ÖÌå¡¢×ֺš¢Ðмä¾àµÈÓÐÄÄЩ¾ßÌåÒª£¿
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
elsevierÒ»ÆÚ¿¯ ÉÏ´« Ð޸ĸåʱ£¬·¢ÏÖÓÐÑ¡Ôñ±à¼ÕâÏ±ØÐëÌîÂð£¬ÎÒ²»ÖªµÀÉÏ´Î˸ºÔð°¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÏÖÔÚElsevierÆìÏÂµÄÆÚ¿¯´¦ÀíËÙ¶ÈÂý£¬ÊDz»ÊÇ¿ÆÑ§¼ÒµÖÖÆµÄ½á¹û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúelsevierÆÚ¿¯Ð£¸åµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ElsevierͶ¸å£¬Éó¸åÈË˵µÄÓи½¼þ´«¸øÎÒÁË£¬µ«ÎÒûÊÕµ½£¬Ôõô»ØÊ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
elsevierµÄÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åʱҪ²éÖØÁË£¿£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åµ½elsevierÆìϵÄÒ»¸öÆÚ¿¯£¬×´Ì¬ÏÔʾacceptºó£¬»¹Òª¸Éʲô°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ÍâÎÄÆÚ¿¯´óÐÞºóÉÏ´«Elsevier
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
elsevierµÄ±à¼¶ÔÂÛÎÄÌá³öÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û£¬Ã»¿´¶®£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ktootk
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 91.7
- Ìû×Ó: 15
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3203455
- ×¢²á: 2014-05-13
- רҵ: Éú̬ϵͳ·þÎñ
|
ÉÏ´ÎҲ˵scholarship²»¹»£¬ÄѵÀѧÊõ²»ÐС£¡£¡£ My main concern with the manuscript is that it lacks the caliber of scholarship required by LAND--there is no research question. But I sense there is a good potential, so would encourage a re-submission after a major overhaul along the two dimensions mentioned above. I would be delighted to take another look when and if such a revamped manuscript is submitted. |
2Â¥2014-07-18 15:53:32
ktootk
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 91.7
- Ìû×Ó: 15
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3203455
- ×¢²á: 2014-05-13
- רҵ: Éú̬ϵͳ·þÎñ
3Â¥2014-07-18 16:11:22
wwmwwm
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 28 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 304.4
- É¢½ð: 1856
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 739
- ÔÚÏß: 210.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 431391
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô·Ç¾§Ì¬¡¢×¼¾§ºÍÄÉÃ×¾§

4Â¥2014-07-18 16:40:20
ktootk
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 91.7
- Ìû×Ó: 15
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3203455
- ×¢²á: 2014-05-13
- רҵ: Éú̬ϵͳ·þÎñ
5Â¥2014-07-18 18:01:57
ktootk
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 91.7
- Ìû×Ó: 15
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3203455
- ×¢²á: 2014-05-13
- רҵ: Éú̬ϵͳ·þÎñ
6Â¥2014-07-18 18:04:29
wwmwwm
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 28 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 304.4
- É¢½ð: 1856
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 739
- ÔÚÏß: 210.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 431391
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô·Ç¾§Ì¬¡¢×¼¾§ºÍÄÉÃ×¾§
|
´ÓÕâЩ»° ¡°While your study topic fits within the aims and scope of our journal, the quality of the scholarship does not meet the standards we require in order to send it out for a full peer review. Therefore I must reject it at this initial stage of review. ÖУ¬¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö£¬¹óÎÄÉÐû´ïµ½ËÍÉóˮƽ¡£ The peer review process places high demands upon experts in the field, and for an international journal such as ours we must be very selective in imposing upon reviewers who give freely of their time.¡± ÎÒÃÇÕâÑùµÄ¿¯ÎïµÄͬÐÐÆÀÉó¹ý³Ì¶Ôר¼ÒµÄÒªÇó½Ï¸ß£¬ÎÒÃDZØÐëÑϸñɸѡ£¬ÕÒµ½ºÏÊÊר¼Ò£¬²¢Ê¹ËûÃÇÔ¸ÒâÎÞ³¥¸¶³öʱ¼ä¡£ Æäʵ£¬ËÍÉóºó£¬»¹ÓкöàÖÖÑ¡Ïî¡£µ±È»ÒÀÀµÓÚ¸å¼þµÄˮƽ¡£ |

7Â¥2014-07-19 10:00:10















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

