| ²é¿´: 323 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ººÒëÓ¢£¬²»µ½100×Ö£¬ÇóÈóÉ«¡£
|
|
ÒÑ֪ͼ2ÖеÄȱÏÝÂÊ£¬Ôòͨ¹ýͼ2¿ÉÒÔ¼ÆËã³öÕû¸öÑùÆ·µÄȱÏÝÂÊΪ7.8%£¬Í¬Àí£¬±¾ÎļÆËãÁ˾ßÓв»Í¬ºñ¶È±ÈµÄÑùÆ·µÄȱÏÝÂÊ£¬¼ûͼ3¡£ÓÉͼ3¿ÉÖª£¬ºñ¶È±ÈÔ½´ó£¬ÔòȱÏÝÂÊÔ½¸ß£¬ÇÒȱÏÝÂÊÔÚ3.0%-9.8%Ö®¼ä¡£ It can be calculated that the entire sample defect rate was 7.8% through Figure 2 in which the defect rate was known. Similarly, the sample defect rate with different thickness ratio was calculated shown in Figure 3. The larger thickness ratio was corresponding to higher defect ratio and the internal friction peak temperature varied within the range of 150-300 ¡ãC. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
¿¼ÑжþÂÖµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϸ´ÊÔÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
085601³õÊÔ330·ÖÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
291 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ324µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
0856ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á Ï£ÍûÊÇaÇøÔºÐ£
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á ²ÄÁÏÓ빤³Ì 324·Ö ר˶
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²©Ê¿×Ô¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´

¸ßÑÒ¸ßÒô
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 25
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2922
- É¢½ð: 325
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 3047
- ÔÚÏß: 251.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2253067
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-21
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò©Îﻯѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+5 2014-07-15 12:16:28
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-15 12:34:25
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+5 2014-07-15 12:16:28
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-15 12:34:25
| It can be calculated that the defect rate of entire sample was 7.8% from Figure 2 .Similarly, the defect rate of sample with different thickness ratio have been computed shown in Figure 3. The larger thickness ratio was corresponding to higher defect ratio and the defect rate is between 3.0% and 9.8%. |

2Â¥2014-07-15 11:05:18













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥