| ²é¿´: 329 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ººÒëÓ¢£¬²»µ½100×Ö£¬ÇóÈóÉ«¡£
|
|
ÒÑ֪ͼ2ÖеÄȱÏÝÂÊ£¬Ôòͨ¹ýͼ2¿ÉÒÔ¼ÆËã³öÕû¸öÑùÆ·µÄȱÏÝÂÊΪ7.8%£¬Í¬Àí£¬±¾ÎļÆËãÁ˾ßÓв»Í¬ºñ¶È±ÈµÄÑùÆ·µÄȱÏÝÂÊ£¬¼ûͼ3¡£ÓÉͼ3¿ÉÖª£¬ºñ¶È±ÈÔ½´ó£¬ÔòȱÏÝÂÊÔ½¸ß£¬ÇÒȱÏÝÂÊÔÚ3.0%-9.8%Ö®¼ä¡£ It can be calculated that the entire sample defect rate was 7.8% through Figure 2 in which the defect rate was known. Similarly, the sample defect rate with different thickness ratio was calculated shown in Figure 3. The larger thickness ratio was corresponding to higher defect ratio and the internal friction peak temperature varied within the range of 150-300 ¡ãC. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
297£¬¹¤¿Æµ÷¼Á?
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
22408 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
ÊÕµ½¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Áµ«ÊÇÈ¥²»ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
260Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¼±Ðèµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
É격/¿¼²©
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´

¸ßÑÒ¸ßÒô
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 25
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2922
- É¢½ð: 325
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 3047
- ÔÚÏß: 251.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2253067
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-21
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò©Îﻯѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+5 2014-07-15 12:16:28
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-15 12:34:25
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+5 2014-07-15 12:16:28
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-15 12:34:25
| It can be calculated that the defect rate of entire sample was 7.8% from Figure 2 .Similarly, the defect rate of sample with different thickness ratio have been computed shown in Figure 3. The larger thickness ratio was corresponding to higher defect ratio and the defect rate is between 3.0% and 9.8%. |

2Â¥2014-07-15 11:05:18













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥