| ²é¿´: 592 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ººÒëÓ¢£¬ÇóÈóÉ«£¬122¸ö×Ö£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
|
|
|
ÔÚ300¡ãC×óÓÒ£¬Á½¸öÑùÆ·¶¼³öÏÖÁËÄ£Á¿·å¡£ÑùÆ·KSµÄÄ£Á¿·åÖµÒªÂÔ¸ßÓÚÑùÆ·LSµÄÄ£Á¿·åÖµ£¬¶ø·åÎÂÈ´µÍÓÚÑùÆ·LSµÄ·åΡ£ÑùÆ·KSºÍLS¾¹ýÈÈ´¦Àíºó²úÉúÁËÔªËØÀ©É¢£¬ÑùÆ·KSºÍLSµÄÀ©É¢Ð±ÂÊk·Ö±ðΪk1=60.9ºÍk2=45.7£¬Ä£Á¿·åÖµ·Ö±ðΪE1= 1.6E11ºÍE2 =2.3E11£¬Ôòµ¥Î»À©É¢Ð±ÂÊÉϵÄÄ£Á¿·åÖµ¿ÉÓÃ∆E / k±íʾ¡£ At about 300 ¡ã C, two samples appeared modulus peaks. Modulus peak value of the sample KS was slightly higher than that of the sample LS, while the peak temperature is lower than the peak temperature of the sample LS. After heat treatment samples KS and LS produced element diffusion, and the diffusion slope k of the sample KS and LS were k1 = 60.9 and k2 = 45.7, respectively corresponding to modulus peak value E1 = 1.6E11 and E2 = 2.3E11. ¦¤E/k represented the modulus peak on unit diffusion slope. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703Çóµ÷¼Á383·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧ085600Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ337·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
085600£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á325·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085600£¬321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§357·Ö£¬¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ£¬085600£¬344·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´

¸ßÑÒ¸ßÒô
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 25
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2922
- É¢½ð: 325
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 3047
- ÔÚÏß: 251.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2253067
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-21
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò©Îﻯѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-12 11:33:18
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2014-07-14 14:49:54
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, good 2014-07-12 11:33:18
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1 2014-07-14 14:49:54
| At about 300 ¡ã C, the modulus peaks of two samples appeared.Modulus peak value of sample KS was slightly higher than sample LS's.But the peak temperature of sample KS is lower than sample LS's.The elements of sample KS and LS have been diffused after heating treatment and the diffusion slope k of the sample KS and LS were k1 = 60.9 and k2 = 45.7,respectively corresponding to modulus peak value were E1 = 1.6E11 and E2 = 2.3E11. ¦¤E/k represented the modulus peak on unit diffusion slope. |

2Â¥2014-07-11 15:30:00
jieman168
¾èÖú¹ó±ö (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- ·ÒëEPI: 4
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 158.2
- É¢½ð: 100
- Ìû×Ó: 36
- ÔÚÏß: 39.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 905100
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓïÑÔѧÆäËûѧ¿Æ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, ¶àл 2014-07-12 11:33:36
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+20, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2014-07-14 14:50:02
ÕæÇ¿±ØÊ¤: ½ð±Ò+1, ¶àл 2014-07-12 11:33:36
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+20, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2014-07-14 14:50:02
|
Çë²Î¿¼£º At about 300 ¡ã C, modulus peaks have been observed in two samples. The value of modulus peak for sample KS was slightly higher than that for sample LS, whereas the peak temperature of KS is lower than that of the sample LS. After treatment by heating, the element diffusion appeared in KS and LS and the diffusion slope k of KS and LS were k1 = 60.9 and k2 = 45.7 respectively and the corresponding value of modulus peak are E1 = 1.6E11 and E2 = 2.3E11. Therefore ¦¤E/k represents the modulus peak for unit diffusion slope. |
3Â¥2014-07-12 02:33:06
loveÁÖÖ®º£
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 106.5
- É¢½ð: 51
- Ìû×Ó: 95
- ÔÚÏß: 43.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3315678
- ×¢²á: 2014-07-09
- רҵ: ÉúÎïÒ½Óø߷Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
At 300 ¡ã C, two samples appeared modulus peak. Modulus modulus peak peak slightly higher than the sample sample KS LS, and the peak temperature is lower than the peak temperature of sample LS. Samples of KS and LS after heat treatment produced the element diffusion, dispersion slope k samples KS and LS were k1=60.9 and k2=45.7, respectively E1= and 1.6E11 modulus peak of E2 =2.3E11, the unit diffusion modulus peak slope can be used on the delta E / K. [ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ] |
4Â¥2014-07-12 21:15:41














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥