| 查看: 3211 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
初次投稿materials letters 审稿人给的意见 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
I suggest the progress from the previous paper "Combustion Science and Technology Volume 186, Issue 7, 3 July 2014, Pages 928-942" may be added in Introduction. The values of all porosity should be shown two significant figures, for matching them with the error bar in Fig.1 and 4. p4 No9 "the individual SDS system having" is not clear. For example, "the individual SDS system neither MPS nor CF having" p4 No20 "foaming, bubbles were partitioned by a thin water film and three films" should be replaced by "foaming, a thin water film partitioned bubbles and three films", to avoid misreading "a thin water film and three films" as one phrase. There are the passive and the active voice in one sentence. p5 No20 "Thus a schematic of the main mechanisms" should be replaced by "Thus a schematic presentation of the main mechanisms" for harmonizing this sentence with the caption of Fig.3, too. p5 No60 and p8 No4 "that equilibriums between the hydration process and the velocity of drainage" is not clear, because process and velocity are different matter. For example, "that equilibriums between the hydration process and the drainage process". p8 No1 "was proposed to result from" is not clear. For example, "was proposed based on the result from". The values of all porosity should be shown two significant figures, for matching them with the error bar in Fig.1 and 4. 各位大牛们，能否替小弟看看这句话是什么意思啊 这种情况下，修改后重投的意义大吗？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 文章投稿经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
0856材料专硕353求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
山东省面上项目限额评审
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学070300 学硕336求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
生物学071000 329分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿华中科技大学071000，求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
生物学一志愿985，分数349求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
生物学调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂院校信息
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工306
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- MATERIALS LETTERS 被拒后能否按照审稿人的意见修改后再次投稿？
已经有25人回复
- 审稿人是major revision，但是Materials Letters拒稿
已经有33人回复
- 审稿人亲身说法---Materials Letters投稿经验
已经有8人回复
- 投Materials letters流程求助
已经有16人回复
- 请问大家能够给几个materials letters 比较好的审稿人么？
已经有4人回复
- Materials Letters 让我审稿，该严一点还是松一点？
已经有53人回复
- Materials Letters 投稿近一个月，还是“With editor”，神马情况
已经有13人回复
- Materials Letters修改之后字数超了，怎么办
已经有5人回复
- materials letters 修改求助
已经有3人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- 关于推荐审稿人的信息问题，以及Materials letter的字数问题
已经有8人回复
- Computers & Structures审稿结果-附上审稿意见-请教虫友
已经有16人回复
- Materials Letters投稿快一个月了，至今一直with editor，是怎么回事？
已经有50人回复
- Materials letters 多久送外审？
已经有12人回复
- materials letters投稿
已经有10人回复
- 有关materials letters的审稿
已经有13人回复
- Materials letters投稿技术审查结果求助
已经有30人回复
- 求助：Materials Letters怎么样？审稿周期长吗？
已经有3人回复
miao12233345
禁虫 (正式写手)
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
9楼2014-07-10 19:27:15
zhaowf1107
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 35 (小学生)
- 金币: 980.3
- 散金: 3815
- 红花: 44
- 帖子: 1114
- 在线: 688.3小时
- 虫号: 750211
- 注册: 2009-04-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 代数学
2楼2014-07-08 15:57:03
梦婷婷玉丽
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 金币: 4003.7
- 散金: 3
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 3177
- 在线: 180小时
- 虫号: 1896143
- 注册: 2012-07-16
- 专业: 生物化学
3楼2014-07-08 16:02:06
|
但是编辑给的意见是大修，然后按照期刊要求，大修就等于自动拒绝，这种情况怎么办？谢谢 Ref.: Ms. No. MLBLUE-D-14-02773 Experimental investigation of closed porosity of solidified foam designed to prevent coal fires Materials Letters Dear Dr. QIN, Thank you for submitting the above paper. We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down. The reviewer recommended that a major revision is needed. based on the policy if the journal, a major revision is an automatic rejection. For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you. Yours sincerely, Prof. Jen-Ming Yang Editor Materials Letters Editor's/Reviewers' comments: |
4楼2014-07-08 19:09:48
