应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 初次投稿materials letters 审稿人给的意见
51/1返回列表
查看: 3022  |  回复: 9
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

luyijx

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 初次投稿materials letters 审稿人给的意见已有2人参与

I suggest the progress from the previous paper "Combustion Science and Technology Volume 186, Issue 7, 3 July 2014, Pages 928-942" may be added in Introduction.
The values of all porosity should be shown two significant figures, for matching them with the error bar in Fig.1 and 4.

p4 No9     "the individual SDS system having" is not clear.  For example, "the individual SDS system neither MPS nor CF having"

p4 No20     "foaming, bubbles were partitioned by a thin water film and three films" should be replaced by "foaming, a thin water film partitioned bubbles and three films", to avoid misreading "a thin water film and three films" as one phrase.  There are the passive and the active voice in one sentence.

p5 No20     "Thus a schematic of the main mechanisms" should be replaced by "Thus a schematic presentation of the main mechanisms" for harmonizing this sentence with the caption of Fig.3, too.

p5 No60     and p8 No4 "that equilibriums between the hydration process and the velocity of drainage" is not clear, because process and velocity are different matter.  For example, "that equilibriums between the hydration process and the drainage process".

p8 No1     "was proposed to result from" is not clear.  For example, "was proposed based on the result from".


The values of all porosity should be shown two significant figures, for matching them with the error bar in Fig.1 and 4. 各位大牛们，能否替小弟看看这句话是什么意思啊
这种情况下，修改后重投的意义大吗？
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

文章投稿经验

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
坚持为了希望
1楼2014-07-08 15:49:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luyijx

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by zhaowf1107 at 2014-07-08 15:57:03
是修改，不是重投。现在的审稿意见很好啊，没什么重大问题

但是编辑给的意见是大修，然后按照期刊要求，大修就等于自动拒绝，这种情况怎么办？谢谢
Ref.:  Ms. No. MLBLUE-D-14-02773
Experimental investigation of closed porosity of solidified foam designed to prevent coal fires
Materials Letters

Dear Dr. QIN,

Thank you for submitting the above paper.

We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.  The reviewer recommended that a major revision is needed.  based on the policy if the journal, a major revision is an automatic rejection.

For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you.

Yours sincerely,

Prof. Jen-Ming Yang
Editor

Materials Letters

Editor's/Reviewers' comments:
赞一下 回复此楼
坚持为了希望
4楼2014-07-08 19:09:48
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

zhaowf1107

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
是修改，不是重投。现在的审稿意见很好啊，没什么重大问题

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
贼一样的激情，狗一样的付出，才能这辈子做好人，下辈子做好狗
2楼2014-07-08 15:57:03
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

梦婷婷玉丽

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
审稿意见很乐观，除了那几处语言问题，还有两幅图有点小问题，改了应该就可以了，加油
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2014-07-08 16:02:06
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luyijx

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 梦婷婷玉丽 at 2014-07-08 16:02:06
审稿意见很乐观，除了那几处语言问题，还有两幅图有点小问题，改了应该就可以了，加油

他的意思是说两幅图中的误差棒不匹配吗？我不理解他是什么意思，我的两幅中谈到的都是孔隙率随着一些变量的趋势，难道她的意思是我第一幅图中孔隙率的误差范围和第二幅图中的孔隙率误差范围不一致，是不是对一系列样品测试过程中，其产生的误差范围是应该差不多的，但是实际测量的数据就是这样啊，所以无解中……    还是他说的是别的意思？
赞一下 回复此楼
坚持为了希望
5楼2014-07-08 19:16:28
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭