24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3489)
>导师招生 (433)
>文献求助 (359)
>休闲灌水 (287)
>虫友互识 (129)
>考博 (121)
>招聘信息布告栏 (91)
>论文道贺祈福 (87)
>硕博家园 (83)
>论文投稿 (75)
>博后之家 (72)
>公派出国 (67)
>基金申请 (61)
>教师之家 (58)
>考研 (38)
>找工作 (33)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chenhua_jsu

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 23.9
帖子: 153
在线: 174小时
虫号: 1592999

[交流] JACS appeal 有必要吗

两个审稿人，一个同意，一个拒绝！最后编辑直接拒搞
第二个审稿人没有提意见，只是说创新性不够，一句话就拒绝了，建议改投其他杂志！
有必要申诉吗？

Reviewer: 1
Significance: Highest (top 5%, suitable for JACS)

Novelty: High (suitable for JACS)

Broad interest: Highest (top 5%, suitable for JACS)

Scholarly presentation: High (suitable for JACS)

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes

Reviewer: 2
Significance: High ( suitable for JACS)

Novelty: Moderate ( not suitable for JACS)

Broad interest: Moderate (not suitable for JACS)

Scholarly presentation: High (suitable for JACS)

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: No

回复此楼