应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 看看这是大修还是小修啊
81/1返回列表
查看: 2217  |  回复: 7
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

jstxrb

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 看看这是大修还是小修啊

大家帮看下是小修还是大修
      Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  
      If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.
      When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.
       When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items:
Response to Reviewers (mandatory)
      This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that you have not made. Mention the page, paragraph, and line number of any revisions that are made.
Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory)
      We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines.  Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information.
Highlights (mandatory)
      Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information
Graphical Abstract (optional)
      Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: http://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts

PLEASE NOTE:  would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerse ScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2014-06-05 14:48:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

brucefan

专家顾问 (著名写手)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
jstxrb: 金币+5, 谢谢 2014-06-05 15:17:29
取决于审稿人的具体问题，需要做很大改动就是大修，否则就是小修。不管是什么修，最重要的是好好回答审稿人的问题。该感谢的感谢，该认可的认可，不认可的反驳，该补充的补充，该阐明的阐明，该改进的改进……

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2014-06-05 14:59:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoligood

专家顾问 (正式写手)

Chemical NMRer
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
jstxrb: 金币+5, 谢谢鼓励 2014-06-05 15:18:27
大修小修其实没什么区别，编辑的意思就是让你按照审稿人的意见一一作答即可，通常属于小修的概念。
赞一下 回复此楼
No Hesitating!
3楼2014-06-05 15:16:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jstxrb

至尊木虫 (著名写手)
第一个审稿人的意见：Though some relevant references are quoted the authors of this paper show no real understanding of the vapor-gas diffusion problem which has been studied theoretically and experimentally for more than 50 years. Many relevant references are not given.
The findings are qualitatively as one would expect. The quantitative results may be of value for those who might want results for this particular gas-vapor combination and the ranges of flow rates and conditions of these tests.
The correlations given would be extremely unlikely to be valid in other circumstances. One would have expected to see Schmidt number in the equations. A purely theoretical solution could be done for the case of annular flow of condensate - very straightforward if gravity is neglected and the flow assumed laminar. This could form the basis of more general correlation but measurements other vapor-gas combinations would be needed.
In short I consider this to be a beginning of what could be a useful investigation but much more work is needed.；
第二个审稿人都是技术问题比较好解答；
我是属于拒搞重投，第一个人审稿人还是原来的，我能直接问他我要引用哪些论文吗，貌似别人引用的我也引用了啊
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2014-06-05 15:18:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jstxrb

至尊木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by zhaoligood at 2014-06-05 15:16:56
大修小修其实没什么区别，编辑的意思就是让你按照审稿人的意见一一作答即可，通常属于小修的概念。

第一审稿人怎么回复啊
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2014-06-05 15:22:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

15941391667

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
6楼2014-06-05 15:26:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

15941391667

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
编辑还没决定，先修改就行，编辑给你修改机会这是最重要的，他还可以找其他的审稿人。
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2014-06-05 15:30:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

brucefan

专家顾问 (著名写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by jstxrb at 2014-06-05 15:18:10
第一个审稿人的意见：Though some relevant references are quoted the authors of this paper show no real understanding of the vapor-gas diffusion problem which has been studied theoretically and experim ...

第一个审稿人你先感谢他给出的批评，肯定，以及建议。针对批评，可能需要多引用些权威的文章，把介绍部分加强些。对于肯定，感谢即可。对于最后的建议，感谢之后可以考虑在结论中展望一下。总之要让审稿人知道你很重视他的意见。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
8楼2014-06-05 15:46:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jstxrb 的主题更新
81/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭