| 查看: 2291 | 回复: 7 | |||
jstxrb至尊木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
看看这是大修还是小修啊
|
|
大家帮看下是小修还是大修 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Response to Reviewers (mandatory) This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that you have not made. Mention the page, paragraph, and line number of any revisions that are made. Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory) We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines. Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information. Highlights (mandatory) Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information Graphical Abstract (optional) Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: http://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts PLEASE NOTE: would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerse ScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有8人回复
-
0703 物理化学调剂
已经有5人回复
-
化学工程321分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
0703化学调剂 290分有科研经历，论文在投
已经有7人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有10人回复
-
焦虑
已经有9人回复
-
0856求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
283求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
深圳大学硕士招生（2026秋，传感器方向，仅录取第一志愿）
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿状态是revise是大修还是小修？
已经有8人回复
- 大修后变小修，俩问题，但比较棘手
已经有131人回复
- 帮忙看一下编辑回复，这是大修还是小修啊，修改后中的机会大吗？
已经有7人回复
- 一天大修变小修，什么情况？
已经有28人回复
- 文章从小修变大修，真是命途多舛啊
已经有40人回复
- 审稿意见两个要大修，一个小修后直接录用，这机会大吗？
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见全是小修，认真修回后却被拒了。这是啥情况？
已经有47人回复
- 大修小修在哪看？
已经有8人回复
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A
已经有11人回复
- PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大
已经有9人回复
- 这属于大修还是小修？
已经有37人回复
- 请看下这个是大修还是小修
已经有18人回复
- 一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修
已经有28人回复
- 小修或者大修一般多久给消息？
已经有6人回复
- 国际氢能 不分大修还是小修吗？
已经有10人回复
- 请问这种情况是大修还是小修，另外reviewer的建议需不需要改？
已经有7人回复
- 主编意思含糊，大家帮着看一下是大修还是小修
已经有21人回复
- 如何辨别大修和小修
已经有11人回复
- 小修变大修，大哭一场！该怎么办？
已经有82人回复
- 帮我看看啊:编辑是要大修还是小修？
已经有15人回复
- 大修之后的小修，怎么办呢？
已经有11人回复
brucefan
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +218 - 应助: 422 (硕士)
- 金币: 2294.8
- 散金: 1720
- 红花: 88
- 帖子: 1423
- 在线: 670.2小时
- 虫号: 3048965
- 注册: 2014-03-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
- 管辖: 分子模拟
2楼2014-06-05 14:59:55
zhaoligood
专家顾问 (正式写手)
Chemical NMRer
-
专家经验: +63 - 应助: 45 (小学生)
- 金币: 4691.3
- 散金: 1190
- 红花: 35
- 帖子: 1000
- 在线: 321.7小时
- 虫号: 555223
- 注册: 2008-05-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构化学
- 管辖: 留学DIY
3楼2014-06-05 15:16:56
jstxrb
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 14267.1
- 散金: 281
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1129
- 在线: 222.3小时
- 虫号: 1017581
- 注册: 2010-05-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 传热传质学
|
第一个审稿人的意见：Though some relevant references are quoted the authors of this paper show no real understanding of the vapor-gas diffusion problem which has been studied theoretically and experimentally for more than 50 years. Many relevant references are not given. The findings are qualitatively as one would expect. The quantitative results may be of value for those who might want results for this particular gas-vapor combination and the ranges of flow rates and conditions of these tests. The correlations given would be extremely unlikely to be valid in other circumstances. One would have expected to see Schmidt number in the equations. A purely theoretical solution could be done for the case of annular flow of condensate - very straightforward if gravity is neglected and the flow assumed laminar. This could form the basis of more general correlation but measurements other vapor-gas combinations would be needed. In short I consider this to be a beginning of what could be a useful investigation but much more work is needed.； 第二个审稿人都是技术问题比较好解答； 我是属于拒搞重投，第一个人审稿人还是原来的，我能直接问他我要引用哪些论文吗，貌似别人引用的我也引用了啊 |
4楼2014-06-05 15:18:10
jstxrb
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 14267.1
- 散金: 281
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1129
- 在线: 222.3小时
- 虫号: 1017581
- 注册: 2010-05-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 传热传质学
5楼2014-06-05 15:22:04
15941391667
铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
 |
6楼2014-06-05 15:26:52
15941391667
铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 102 (高中生)
- 金币: 10643.8
- 散金: 666
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 13284
- 在线: 695.7小时
- 虫号: 1855532
- 注册: 2012-06-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 多相流热物理学
7楼2014-06-05 15:30:27
brucefan
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +218 - 应助: 422 (硕士)
- 金币: 2294.8
- 散金: 1720
- 红花: 88
- 帖子: 1423
- 在线: 670.2小时
- 虫号: 3048965
- 注册: 2014-03-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
- 管辖: 分子模拟
8楼2014-06-05 15:46:37
