| 查看: 939 | 回复: 3 | ||
[求助]
文章大修了，大牛们帮我看看有没有希望 已有3人参与
|
|
最近投了一篇Analytical methods-UK。 一个月以后大修了，审稿人的意见给的挺长的，还提出了创新性不足的问题。我已经根据审稿人的意见把要求加上的数据都加上了。创新性要求强化的地方我也做了强化。不知道能不能接收。第一篇文章，也是毕业保命的，所以，慎重又慎重啊！ 我的审稿意见全文如下。 Manuscript ID XXX"" which you submitted to Analytical Methods, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author XX et al reported ... I appreciate the authors’ efforts and in the mean time I find that the approach has limited novelty with some problems. Overall, the author presented a method aimed at reducing the time consumed and improving the extraction efficiency for analysis of .... The sample preparation of this method included. However, the method of ...(Ref. 25) is also a ... method. The only differences are.... The authors did not directly compare their method directly with the method reported by Ref.25. I suggested the authors to clarify the obvious advantages of their method compared with ...methods which have been reported by other researchers. Although this work contained some elements that I believe would be valuable for analysis of ..., the manuscript as it stands currently has some deficiencies to be suitable for publication in Analytical Method. I truly hope that the authors can adequately address the concerns I enumerated below and get this work published. Minor Issues 1. Line 96 in the introduction section 略. 2. Language mistakes: Line 190, 略 Line 200, 略 Line 280, 略 Major Issues 四点问题，略 (This paper if published would be more suitable for Analytical Methods compared to Analyst.) Referee: 2 Comments to the Author 四条，具体的略. Comment:-The authors presented a highly sensitive method for.... which will help in the present scenario of analytical techniques. It is a publishable work, after so many modifications. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有27人回复
-
所感
已经有3人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有11人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
26申博（荧光探针方向，有机合成）
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家进来帮我看一看，主编复审的意思究竟如何！
已经有8人回复
- 关于审稿意见，请大家帮忙看看
已经有52人回复
- 修改稿提交后编辑发了这个邮件是什么意思啊，ultimate control？？最后的裁决？
已经有11人回复
- 投稿十天左右，主编给了我这么一封邮件，什么意思
已经有16人回复
- 编辑给我发的接受邮件，打印这个就能毕业吗？帮忙看看啊再发100
已经有102人回复
- 有关NRF2信号通路的问题，希望各位大牛帮助解答
已经有10人回复
- 不抛弃不放弃，我的第一篇SCI之路
已经有33人回复
- JSCS大修，请各位大牛给点修改意见和经验
已经有28人回复
- 自己推荐的审稿人（自己认识的同行）审理自己的稿件，他的意见会被编辑采纳吗？
已经有36人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
mutian1967
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 123.8
- 散金: 860
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 296
- 在线: 168.5小时
- 虫号: 730897
- 注册: 2009-03-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体力学
2楼2014-05-21 14:57:22
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
3楼2014-05-21 19:20:20
yaneryouyan
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 3131.4
- 散金: 100
- 红花: 48
- 帖子: 407
- 在线: 305小时
- 虫号: 1342499
- 注册: 2011-07-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
4楼2014-05-21 19:52:52