应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » IET论文被拒了，该如何是好
51/1返回列表
查看: 6402  |  回复: 25
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

285561706

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] IET论文被拒了，该如何是好

本来知道自己论文创新点不大够，审稿两个月还是被拒了，心理还是有一定准备吧，主编建议重投，到底还是重投还是投其它的水刊呢，顺带求电力电子和材料加工（焊接）的方向易中的SCI(影响因子小于1都行）
Thank you for submitting your paper to IET ---. The peer review process is now complete. We feel that your paper requires significantly more work and is not acceptable for publication in its current form.  Our decision is therefore to decline your paper with encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper.  We appreciate that this decision will be a disappointment, but hope that you find the referees' comments (given below) useful in improving your paper.

If, following comprehensive revision, you should choose to submit your paper again, please go to …….

When submitting a revised manuscript, please ensure that all points raised by the referees have been actioned, and include a detailed covering letter explaining the changes made.  Note that the revised paper will be treated as a completely new submission and sent out for a fresh round of reviewing.

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This work is mainly about the digital implementation of the control of an inverter. In my opinion it does not provide any valuable information about the digital implementation itself, e.g. the discrete-time model of the plant or the stability analysis of the closed-loop system. The authors only provide general information and do not go into the details of any aspect.

In order to better appreciate the contribution of your work I would recommend to focus the attention of your paper into a particular aspect of the implementation and go into the very details of it providing valuable information to the reader.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper does not include an advance in power electronics, but show a good engineering example.
For publication, this paper should be revised.

First, it is better to find some alternative terms of former and latter inverters.
In the paper, the former inverter and the high frequency transformer part is a typical phase-shifted full bridge converter. You may use some other words, for example, pre- or post processing stages.

Second, the design procedure should be more detailed.

Third, the use of the certain microprocessor may be omitted.

Fourth, although the authors have claimed 'digital control', I don't see any significant advance or important content for 'digital control'.
Please add more analysis based on digital control theory in power electronics.
Otherwise, it is better not to emphasize 'digital'.

Fifth, the English language should be improved.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
1.The authors claim improvements in quality of output current and higher efficiency – could you please validate them with respect to the conventional approach, at least by using simulations?
2. Could you please provide results for transient conditions in simulations and experimentally?
3. Could you please state it very clearly what is novelty of the paper?
4. Reference [6] is not available
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
、简单就好、
1楼2014-05-10 20:51:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

armstronglet

至尊木虫 (职业作家)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
IEEE的magazine没投过，不知道好不好中。可以试一下，即便被拒也是很快。电力电子的有个今年刚创刊的：IEEE Power Electronics Magazine，看会不会容易一些。即便是Magazine，你的方案的实现过程还是要详细论述。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
4楼2014-05-10 21:54:09
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 26 个回答

armstronglet

至尊木虫 (职业作家)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
285561706: 金币+5 2014-05-10 21:36:51
关键是创新点的问题，要突出创新点，并让审稿人认可。再就是其理论基础和具体实现的问题没有论述清楚。如果理论基础能够写清楚，就修改重投。如果自己感觉驾驭不了“数字控制”的理论本质，还是改投工程应用类杂志吧（类似IEEE的Magazine，对创新要求不高，对理论要求也不高，但工程应用要求论述全面）
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2014-05-10 21:19:14
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

285561706

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by armstronglet at 2014-05-10 21:19:14
关键是创新点的问题，要突出创新点，并让审稿人认可。再就是其理论基础和具体实现的问题没有论述清楚。如果理论基础能够写清楚，就修改重投。如果自己感觉驾驭不了“数字控制”的理论本质，还是改投工程应用类杂志吧 ...

恩 其实实验室都不搞这些理论基础的   连导师自己都清楚这一弱项   虽然Reject & Resubmit ，网上说是“大修中的大修”，说明还是有一定希望   但说实话心理没底  得咨询导师的打算了……个人觉得符合自己的研究实际，投工程应用类的……话说IEEE的magazine会不会也挺难的  ，还有类似的工程应用类有哪些相对好中的……感谢你的回答啊
赞一下 回复此楼
、简单就好、
3楼2014-05-10 21:36:54
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

changh

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
285561706: 金币+1, 只能这样了 2014-05-12 17:11:39
还是改投其它刊物吧。
祝福楼主好运！
赞一下 回复此楼
北方
8楼2014-05-10 23:20:41
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 26 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭