24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4451  |  回复: 26

laodai00

铁虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Applied Optics 大修后被拒,该如何是好,请各位虫友指教 已有9人参与

初审两个审稿人,一个同意发表,一个不同意,编辑给的大修,修改完编辑又返回给那个不同意发表的审稿人,一个月后被拒,意见如下:

Dear Sir ***:
Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics.
If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date.
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future.
Sincerely,
****  ****,
Topical Editor, APPLIED OPTICS
----------------------------
Reviewer comments provided here:
Reviewer 1
After reading thru the authors responding letter, I was not convinced by the authors’ arguments.
The major problem was focused on the linear Interpolation estimation of the unknowns that the authors proposed for wavefront estimation of large amount of shearing. It is true that for 2-D wavefront estimation, if wavefront resolution is based on the shear amount, the spatial resolution can be low for the large shears. And if you want to obtain a high spatial resolution estimation, you have to take more measurements. This is the price we should pay at present for high resolution estimation. Compare to the small shear (such as one pixel shear), wavefront estimation based on large shear (more than one pixel) with proposed method does have an advantage of high resolution in wavefront estimation as the small shear, except for linear interpolation approach for the wavefront unknowns, which is not acceptable. If the interpolation could be used for estimating the unknown values, why the authors do not use the linear interpolation of wavefront slope? At least it is more accurate and more reasonable than the linear interpolation of the unknown wavefront. It is also true that for the large shear the signal to noise ratio could be higher, but we are not clear how the authors would treat the 2pi(or one pi) phase ambiguity for the large shear scenario, which can be a big problem.

For the finite difference based wavefront estimation, it is approximate method even if the authors think it is “ exactly accurate in principle”. It is generally not acceptable in the field of wavefront metrology if a method is principally incorrect even if the induced error is only 1-5% for some specific simulation examples. Of course, you can still use it as your own purpose, but it is not proper to publish to mislead the academia.

各位怎么看?重投还是改投?
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

找工作

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yml11788

金虫 (正式写手)

知识就是力量
2楼2012-12-12 10:10:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

laodai00

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by yml11788 at 2012-12-12 10:10:48
改投

重投还有希望吗?这个实在是运气不好,阁下以为改投到哪个杂志比较合适
3楼2012-12-12 10:49:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hustoe2011

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
不要重投了,
人家在质疑你学术上的正确性。

重投,再次杯具
随心所欲不逾矩
4楼2012-12-12 13:14:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

laodai00

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by hustoe2011 at 2012-12-12 13:14:17
不要重投了,
人家在质疑你学术上的正确性。

重投,再次杯具

嗯,还是改投吧
5楼2012-12-12 13:33:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nuaawq

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主还是改投吧 祝福楼主啊。。。。
6楼2012-12-12 13:34:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

laodai00

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by nuaawq at 2012-12-12 13:34:56
楼主还是改投吧 祝福楼主啊。。。。

嗯,形势很不妙,考虑改投
7楼2012-12-12 13:39:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wxk82721

银虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
可以选择的期刊有optics communications,但和AO是一个档次的,再往下就是Modern Optics,再往下Optical engineering,再往下Optik,再往下国内的非SCI,反正总有一款适合你!祝福!
8楼2012-12-12 21:16:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

laodai00

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by wxk82721 at 2012-12-12 21:16:52
可以选择的期刊有optics communications,但和AO是一个档次的,再往下就是Modern Optics,再往下Optical engineering,再往下Optik,再往下国内的非SCI,反正总有一款适合你!祝福!

OC审稿太慢,搞不好大半年出去了,小oe比较靠谱,optik据说是SCI的垃圾回收站,不投也罢
9楼2012-12-12 23:06:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

406600436

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
optical material?
10楼2012-12-12 23:41:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 laodai00 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +4 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 4/200 2026-08-24 08:47 by gloomy6159
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +10 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 11/550 2026-08-24 06:50 by 开心的小狮子
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +5 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 6/300 2026-08-24 06:34 by sincosx
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +11 kulium 2026-08-21 14/700 2026-08-24 02:12 by 流流伤
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +16 羊腰板 2026-08-21 17/850 2026-08-23 23:02 by tianxiaochun
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +12 大萍1987 2026-08-20 15/750 2026-08-23 20:44 by 大萍1987
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +24 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 26/1300 2026-08-22 17:43 by kammury
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +13 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-22 17:08 by WH3796
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +16 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-22 16:12 by 阿布Abu
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见