| 查看: 3078 | 回复: 26 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
Applied Optics 大修后被拒,该如何是好，请各位虫友指教已有9人参与
|
||||
|
初审两个审稿人，一个同意发表，一个不同意，编辑给的大修，修改完编辑又返回给那个不同意发表的审稿人，一个月后被拒，意见如下： Dear Sir ***: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely, **** ****, Topical Editor, APPLIED OPTICS ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 After reading thru the authors responding letter, I was not convinced by the authors’ arguments. The major problem was focused on the linear Interpolation estimation of the unknowns that the authors proposed for wavefront estimation of large amount of shearing. It is true that for 2-D wavefront estimation, if wavefront resolution is based on the shear amount, the spatial resolution can be low for the large shears. And if you want to obtain a high spatial resolution estimation, you have to take more measurements. This is the price we should pay at present for high resolution estimation. Compare to the small shear (such as one pixel shear), wavefront estimation based on large shear (more than one pixel) with proposed method does have an advantage of high resolution in wavefront estimation as the small shear, except for linear interpolation approach for the wavefront unknowns, which is not acceptable. If the interpolation could be used for estimating the unknown values, why the authors do not use the linear interpolation of wavefront slope? At least it is more accurate and more reasonable than the linear interpolation of the unknown wavefront. It is also true that for the large shear the signal to noise ratio could be higher, but we are not clear how the authors would treat the 2pi(or one pi) phase ambiguity for the large shear scenario, which can be a big problem. For the finite difference based wavefront estimation, it is approximate method even if the authors think it is “ exactly accurate in principle”. It is generally not acceptable in the field of wavefront metrology if a method is principally incorrect even if the induced error is only 1-5% for some specific simulation examples. Of course, you can still use it as your own purpose, but it is not proper to publish to mislead the academia. 各位怎么看？重投还是改投？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐
 找工作 |
» 猜你喜欢
申博雅思求助
已经有7人回复
-
专科院校申请国自然
已经有18人回复
-
厅级项目出校却没中
已经有20人回复
-
博后网上办公系统维护
已经有6人回复
-
基金申请书名称有变化
已经有7人回复
-
关于读博感觉自己很抓马
已经有21人回复
-
高校辞职，要求赔偿，这到底合不合理
已经有34人回复
-
考博英语
已经有8人回复
-
博士该不该读？
已经有5人回复
-
申博好难
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投APPLIED OPTICS被拒了，按照修改意见修改后，是否可以再投回去？
已经有9人回复
- 投Applied Optics返回审稿意见，恳请各位看看给点意见
已经有11人回复
- 关于投往Applied Optics期刊中通信作者的问题
已经有8人回复
- Optics Express被拒后改后投Applied optics？
已经有9人回复
- 请教Applied optics的Manuscript Accepted with Mandatory Revisions是个什么状态？
已经有15人回复
- Applied Optics 模板求助
已经有3人回复
- Applied Optics 怎么这么慢啊？
已经有17人回复
- 投Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics，这样的拒稿意见是否冤枉？
已经有11人回复
- applied optics 投稿求助
已经有14人回复
- 一个月前投了篇到《Applied Optics》，但目前审稿状态看不懂
已经有18人回复
- 求助：Cr2O3 能被氢气还原吗？请各位虫友指教啊。谢谢
已经有3人回复
- Optical engineering 和 Applied optics 哪个更容易中？
已经有22人回复
- 谁经历过Applied Optics审稿过程中的Other？
已经有7人回复
- applied optics 怎样投稿？
已经有4人回复
- applied optics接受后的proof
已经有5人回复
- 请各位虫友指教：关于GPA的算法？
已经有3人回复
10楼2012-12-12 23:41:22
14楼2012-12-13 10:05:23
18楼2012-12-13 10:25:29
5