24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1892  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zouzhengzhong

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 两个审稿人意见正向,但主编认为缺乏新意,给拒了? 已有6人参与

两个审稿人,审稿速度非常快(一般一个月给回复,结果半个月就出结果)。两个审稿人意见都是正向的。
第一个主要意思:“This is nice work, as I would expect from the XXX laboratory. I have a few suggestions for improvements to the figures and text and would also suggest that one of the more interesting discoveries here”
第二个主要意思:“Overall, this work is carefully done and the data are very convincing. The findings presented herein should be interesting for the researchers working in XXX and are suitable for publication in Mol Micro. However, there still exist some flaws that should be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication. ”
主编的意思:“After considering all of the points raised by the referees, and having carefully read the manuscript myself, I have concluded that this submission may be more appropriate for our affiliated open access journal, MicrobiologyOpen. We suggest this option for those selected papers that are of overall very high quality, but that, in the opinion of the referees and editor, lack the very high impact and breadth of interest desired for publication in XXX. ”
这是怎么回事呢?如果argue有用吗?急!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zouzhengzhong

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by benniu at 2014-04-27 10:56:37
如果是审稿人的意见离谱,可以argue,
你这主要是主编下的结论,去argue,估计作用不大

哎,可是审稿人意见都挺正面的,我觉得是主编对我们这个领域不是很了解,觉得文章缺乏新意,就这样被枪毙了有点不甘心啊。
6楼2014-04-27 14:08:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

benniu

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
如果是审稿人的意见离谱,可以argue,
你这主要是主编下的结论,去argue,估计作用不大
2楼2014-04-27 10:56:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yzc2

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
主编是老大。
审稿人充其量是参谋(不带长)
4楼2014-04-27 11:00:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

飞扬无双

禁虫 (著名写手)

本帖内容被屏蔽

5楼2014-04-27 12:35:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 23:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +4 349506619 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 22:41 by alongwaytogo
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-29 22:27 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-29 21:44 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-29 21:22 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-29 21:11 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 18:26 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +6 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-29 17:31 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +9 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 9/450 2026-08-29 14:41 by hustersqt
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 14:02 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 13:51 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-29 09:59 by jklily
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见