| 查看: 1672 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
两个审稿人意见正向，但主编认为缺乏新意，给拒了？ 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
两个审稿人，审稿速度非常快（一般一个月给回复，结果半个月就出结果）。两个审稿人意见都是正向的。 第一个主要意思：“This is nice work, as I would expect from the XXX laboratory. I have a few suggestions for improvements to the figures and text and would also suggest that one of the more interesting discoveries here” 第二个主要意思：“Overall, this work is carefully done and the data are very convincing. The findings presented herein should be interesting for the researchers working in XXX and are suitable for publication in Mol Micro. However, there still exist some flaws that should be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication. ” 主编的意思：“After considering all of the points raised by the referees, and having carefully read the manuscript myself, I have concluded that this submission may be more appropriate for our affiliated open access journal, MicrobiologyOpen. We suggest this option for those selected papers that are of overall very high quality, but that, in the opinion of the referees and editor, lack the very high impact and breadth of interest desired for publication in XXX. ” 这是怎么回事呢？如果argue有用吗？急！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有7人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有10人回复
-
救命帖
已经有11人回复
-
招博士
已经有5人回复
-
青年基金C终止
已经有3人回复
-
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
-
限项规定
已经有7人回复
-
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
-
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 一审意见回来了，一个审稿人竭力推荐发表，另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
- 审稿人要求最好用实验验证模拟结果，怎么办？偶就会模拟，不会实验，如何答复？
已经有19人回复
6楼2014-04-27 14:08:10
2楼2014-04-27 10:56:37
yzc2
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7478.4
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 523
- 在线: 1061.2小时
- 虫号: 156456
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 信息处理方法与技术
4楼2014-04-27 11:00:57
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2014-04-27 12:35:34