| 查看: 1726 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
两个审稿人意见正向，但主编认为缺乏新意，给拒了？ 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
两个审稿人，审稿速度非常快（一般一个月给回复，结果半个月就出结果）。两个审稿人意见都是正向的。 第一个主要意思：“This is nice work, as I would expect from the XXX laboratory. I have a few suggestions for improvements to the figures and text and would also suggest that one of the more interesting discoveries here” 第二个主要意思：“Overall, this work is carefully done and the data are very convincing. The findings presented herein should be interesting for the researchers working in XXX and are suitable for publication in Mol Micro. However, there still exist some flaws that should be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication. ” 主编的意思：“After considering all of the points raised by the referees, and having carefully read the manuscript myself, I have concluded that this submission may be more appropriate for our affiliated open access journal, MicrobiologyOpen. We suggest this option for those selected papers that are of overall very high quality, but that, in the opinion of the referees and editor, lack the very high impact and breadth of interest desired for publication in XXX. ” 这是怎么回事呢？如果argue有用吗？急！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿中国海洋大学，生物学，301分，求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
081700化工学硕调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料学硕318求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
329求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿苏州大学材料求调剂，总分315（英一）
已经有3人回复
-
0703化学调剂
已经有14人回复
-
320求调剂0856
已经有3人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
288求调剂
已经有15人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 一审意见回来了，一个审稿人竭力推荐发表，另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
- 审稿人要求最好用实验验证模拟结果，怎么办？偶就会模拟，不会实验，如何答复？
已经有19人回复
yzc2
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7478.9
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 523
- 在线: 1061.2小时
- 虫号: 156456
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 信息处理方法与技术
4楼2014-04-27 11:00:57
2楼2014-04-27 10:56:37
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2014-04-27 12:35:34
6楼2014-04-27 14:08:10
