24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1446  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

super_nan

木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] Food Chemistry 投稿 申诉 求助

投稿Food Chemistry 两个审稿人 一个接受 一个拒稿
我想写个 申诉信 看看有希望改变主编意见么
大家觉得可以行否。。。

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they disagree, Reviewer #1 recommending acceptance, and Reviewer #2 recommending rejection. I agree with Reviewer #2's more in-depth analysis. He/She has some very good advice for you to consider.    Therefore I must reject it.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: XXXX. Therefore, I strongly recommend to accept the paper for publication in Food Chemistry.

Reviewer #2: The present manuscript entitled XXXX:
This manuscript has not enough novelty in comparison to other works, but specially in comparison to the authors own previous work that is about to be published in this very same journal. Therefore I cannot recommend it for publication. In addition there are some thoughts I would like to offer to the authors:
- There are some misleading ideas in the manuscript:
.......   There are several other experimental design aspects that need further attention and improvement from authors.

I hope this will help authors in the future.

Yours sincerely.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liangxingqiu

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得这个编辑提得挺好的建议啊,为什么不好好改改再投,而是投诉呢?
12楼2014-03-27 16:12:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

gendalf

金虫 (著名写手)



super_nan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
感觉编辑说的很明确了。审稿人2也提了些有用的建议,对楼主还是有帮助的。
9楼2014-03-27 12:37:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

super_nan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
路过顺便顶一下 祝楼主一切顺利!
11楼2014-03-27 13:02:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
wdxmu7楼
2014-03-27 12:32   回复  
super_nan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见