| 查看: 3483 | 回复: 32 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投green chem的通讯悲剧了，被建议转至RSC Advances
|
|||
|
有些郁闷啊。本来觉得创新性挺好的，也复合绿色化学的办刊宗旨，结果悲剧了。郁闷。 Thank you for your submission to Green Chemistry. All manuscripts submitted to Green Chemistry are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your paper will not be considered further because it is not of sufficient impact to appeal to our readership. Full details of the initial assessment can be found at the following URL: http://www.rsc.org/initialassessment/ However, I would encourage you to transfer your work to our sister-journal RSC Advances. RSC Advances publishes high-quality research from across the chemical sciences, and has sophisticated topic modelling technology to ensure the visibility of your research. RSC Advances was launched in 2011 and already has a partial impact factor of 2.5, with a rejection rate that is currently 50%. More information about RSC Advances can be found at www.rsc.org/advances 本来计划着，混到个green chem的审稿意见，即使被拒，也可以根据审稿意见改进一下尝试chemsuschem呢，结果。。。。。。。也只好接受转投了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有7人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
31楼2014-06-18 09:35:35
3楼2014-03-27 09:29:39
5