24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3078)
>虫友互识 (226)
>文献求助 (185)
>导师招生 (165)
>休闲灌水 (128)
>考博 (64)
>硕博家园 (50)
>博后之家 (44)
>考研 (41)
>基金申请 (35)
>招聘信息布告栏 (30)
>论文投稿 (25)
>找工作 (24)
>教师之家 (18)
>公派出国 (16)
>论文道贺祈福 (14)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallfolk

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 92 (初中生)
金币: 657.2
帖子: 698
在线: 597.7小时
虫号: 442827

[交流] 投green chem的通讯悲剧了，被建议转至RSC Advances

有些郁闷啊。本来觉得创新性挺好的，也复合绿色化学的办刊宗旨，结果悲剧了。郁闷。
Thank you for your submission to Green Chemistry. All manuscripts submitted to Green Chemistry are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your paper will not be considered further because it is not of sufficient impact to appeal to our readership.
Full details of the initial assessment can be found at the following URL: http://www.rsc.org/initialassessment/
However, I would encourage you to transfer your work to our sister-journal RSC Advances. RSC Advances publishes high-quality research from across the chemical sciences, and has sophisticated topic modelling technology to ensure the visibility of your research. RSC Advances was launched in 2011 and already has a partial impact factor of 2.5, with a rejection rate that is currently 50%. More information about RSC Advances can be found at www.rsc.org/advances
本来计划着，混到个green chem的审稿意见，即使被拒，也可以根据审稿意见改进一下尝试chemsuschem呢，结果。。。。。。。也只好接受转投了。

回复此楼