| 查看: 929 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
编辑回稿了，求虫友们帮我看看接收的概率高吗？已有1人参与
|
|
The reviewer(s) would like to see some revisions made to your manuscript before the next re-evaluation step. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. This second evaluation step does not necessary implicate that your manuscript will be finally accepted. IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This article is mainly to investigate the spectral patterns in the Nifedipine/ Soluplus/ Kollidon solid dispersions (SD).The evaluation of the solid dispersions was also done. The authors have done many works in order to make the experiment persuasive and creditable. Some questions and advice were given about this article。 1. The X-ray diffraction method should be employed in comparison to FT-IR. 2.The aging of solid dispersions is a common problem。The application of different preparation methods was not enough to deal with the aging problem。 The formula modification attempts were absent in this article。 3.The publication period of most references was a little old and should be updated. Peer Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author 1. Please modify the English expressions in details of this paper carefully. 2. Are the samples prepared for SEM before or after milling? If they are milled samples, the SEM spectrum cannot tell the original morphology. And SEM may not be a strong technic to distinguish the polymorphs of the materials (amorphous or crystalline). 3. Could the author provide a Tg of the formulation from the DSC, which could be a better proof to prove the formulations are amorphous? 4. “The interaction strength between the drugs and the polymers can determine the degree that the crystal state change into the amorphous state.” Is there any paper support this theory? 5. If the author could show the SEM under the same enlargement factor , that would be easy to compare. 6. Could the author explain the Figure 7 more in details? 7. Is Figure 8 drawn based on the FT-IR results? Could the author please tell what FTIR in corresponded with which interactions? 8. Is the intensity of the FTIR related to the amount author used to make the KBr pellet? How to control this variable? 9. Is there any possible that there also exists interaction between two polymers in formulation? And please explain why the author used both two polymers in one formulation? 求各位热心虫友帮我看看接收的概率高吗？这个修改意见算多吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
25考研调剂上岸必进！8W+条840+所院校调剂信息实时更新扣裙:601404816
已经有25人回复
-
25考研调剂上岸必进！8W+条840+所院校调剂信息实时更新扣裙:601404816
已经有18人回复
-
现在报基金要打招呼吗
已经有5人回复
-
想找一位年轻的985博导
已经有14人回复
-
纠结退学ing
已经有41人回复
-
机械哪个期刊好中
已经有6人回复
-
离职
已经有16人回复
-
膜截留分子量曲线拟合
已经有7人回复
-
2025博士申请
已经有7人回复
-
【怎么确定一种物质呀】xrd测不出峰的材料
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 生平第一篇SCI，历经波折后终于收到修改意见，大家看看有多大的发表概率！
已经有41人回复
- 咨询文章接收后编辑的信，求帮忙！
已经有3人回复
- 修改后终审被接收的几率大吗
已经有9人回复
- 编辑给的回复是这样的，这样最后接受的几率大吗？
已经有5人回复
- 论文退修是啥意思呢，接受的概率大吗
已经有12人回复
- 论文大修稿进入Awaiting decision状态，请问接受概率多大？
已经有13人回复
- 《测控技术》退修，有多大的机率被接受啊？
已经有13人回复
- 请问投文章的时候按照期刊模版会增加接收概率吗？
已经有5人回复
- 文章大修，不知道被接收的几率有多大？散金币，求祝福
已经有154人回复
- BT投稿，re-revision要求删去一个图，请问文章接收的概率
已经有19人回复
- 一篇文章被JACS拒了，想重投，请问具体怎么联系副主编啊？被接受的几率有多大啊？
已经有30人回复
- JACS审稿意见（一大修，一小修，最后接收的概率多大？？？）
已经有88人回复
- 大修后 rereviewer审稿时间与接收的概率有关系么
已经有5人回复
- 中国农业科学退修后接受的几率大吗？
已经有12人回复
- 套磁之后外导回信了，请问各位这种情况接收的概率有多大？
已经有13人回复
- 大修的文章有多大概率被接受？
已经有18人回复
- 中国物理快报“退修”状态接受的概率有多大
已经有11人回复
- Major revisions 接收的几率是多少啊 大不 有经历的谈谈。。。
已经有18人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大
已经有9人回复
- moderate revise 之后2天变成Decision in Process接收的几率大吗
已经有74人回复
- 【求助】英国的博士申请，导师同意接受了，通过学校的审查的概率有多大？
已经有21人回复
- 收到拒稿,给了很多意见，大改后重投概率多大？
已经有23人回复
- 被退稿，再投此杂志接受的几率大吗？
已经有15人回复
- journal of power sources 返回revision接受的几率有多大？
已经有9人回复
zhangyo_hust
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 939.1
- 散金: 46
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 105
- 在线: 180.5小时
- 虫号: 2489634
- 注册: 2013-05-31
- 专业: 海洋工程
2楼2014-03-24 16:02:56
3楼2014-03-24 16:06:59
zhangyo_hust
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 939.1
- 散金: 46
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 105
- 在线: 180.5小时
- 虫号: 2489634
- 注册: 2013-05-31
- 专业: 海洋工程
4楼2014-03-24 16:12:10
5楼2014-03-24 16:21:44
zhangyo_hust
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 939.1
- 散金: 46
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 105
- 在线: 180.5小时
- 虫号: 2489634
- 注册: 2013-05-31
- 专业: 海洋工程
6楼2014-03-24 16:45:37
50