24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1439  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

转角处的蜕变

木虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 编辑回稿了,求虫友们帮我看看接收的概率高吗? 已有1人参与

The reviewer(s) would like to see some revisions made to your manuscript before the next re-evaluation step. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. This second evaluation step does not necessary implicate that your manuscript will be finally accepted.
IMPORTANT:  Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript.  Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable
amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This article is mainly to investigate the spectral patterns in the Nifedipine/ Soluplus/ Kollidon solid dispersions (SD).The evaluation of the solid dispersions was also done. The authors have done many works in order to make the experiment persuasive and creditable. Some questions and advice were given about this article。
1. The X-ray diffraction method should be employed in comparison to FT-IR.
2.The aging of solid dispersions is a common problem。The application of different preparation methods was not enough to deal with the aging problem。 The formula modification attempts were absent in this article。
3.The publication period of most references was a little old and should be updated.

Peer Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author

1.        Please modify the English expressions in details of this paper carefully.
2.        Are the samples prepared for SEM before or after milling? If they are milled samples, the SEM spectrum cannot tell the original morphology. And SEM may not be a strong technic to distinguish the polymorphs of the materials (amorphous or crystalline).
3.        Could the author provide a Tg of the formulation from the DSC, which could be a better proof to prove the formulations are amorphous?
4.        “The interaction strength between the drugs and the polymers can determine the degree that the crystal state change into the amorphous state.” Is there any paper support this theory?
5.        If the author could show the SEM under the same enlargement factor , that would be easy to compare.
6.        Could the author explain the Figure 7 more in details?
7.        Is Figure 8 drawn based on the FT-IR results? Could the author please tell what FTIR in corresponded with which interactions?
8.        Is the intensity of the FTIR related to the amount author used to make the KBr pellet? How to control this variable?
9.        Is there any possible that there also exists interaction between two polymers in formulation?
And please explain why the author used both two polymers in one formulation?
求各位热心虫友帮我看看接收的概率高吗?这个修改意见算多吗?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

有志者事竟成
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangyo_hust

金虫 (小有名气)

我们学科不一样不好比吧,而且各个期刊不一样。如果是修改的话,不是会给你个时间底线吗?我们都差不多比deadline提前一点交修改稿

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
6楼2014-03-24 16:45:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

zhangyo_hust

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
转角处的蜕变: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-03-24 16:07:58
按照修改意见改,应该很有希望,我第一次大改有30几条意见……

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2014-03-24 16:02:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

转角处的蜕变

木虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by zhangyo_hust at 2014-03-24 16:02:56
按照修改意见改,应该很有希望,我第一次大改有30几条意见……

谢谢,如果编辑让补做一个测试,是不是必须要做,就像第一个编辑说的让我补做一个X射线衍射。
有志者事竟成
3楼2014-03-24 16:06:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangyo_hust

金虫 (小有名气)

我不是你这个方向的,不过有时候审稿人的问题很贱,不好做的话,我们会说明原因,然后说后续研究中会加入

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
4楼2014-03-24 16:12:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +5 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 6/300 2026-08-12 16:26 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode +13 documentary 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-12 15:56 by 云上清扬
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +7 布布和一二 2026-08-10 10/500 2026-08-12 09:12 by 布布和一二
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +3 majunge000 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 20:13 by lch2012
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +8 家与远方 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 09:49 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 基金中了 +15 laoda193707 2026-08-06 15/750 2026-08-11 00:11 by jiafei2190
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +5 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-10 17:19 by Tide man
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 这样的filecode谁见过 +11 布布和一二 2026-08-08 22/1100 2026-08-10 11:10 by wmfsnow
[基金申请] 关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量 +5 yang182083 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-08 18:29 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode +8 布布和一二 2026-08-06 11/550 2026-08-06 20:41 by tangpu318
信息提示
请填处理意见