应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 请诸位小木虫的高手帮忙鉴定一下这封编辑回信是什么意思，有修改后接受的意思吗
51/1返回列表
查看: 3218  |  回复: 13
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

飞鸿惊鸿

铜虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请诸位小木虫的高手帮忙鉴定一下这封编辑回信是什么意思，有修改后接受的意思吗 已有1人参与

主编：
I regret to inform you that our reviewers have now considered your paper but unfortunately feel it unsuitable for publication in International Journal of Sustainable Energy.  
The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter, along with those of the editor who coordinated the review of your paper.  I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful.
I have read your paper and believe that it can become a good one, so I would strongly encourage you to proceed along those lines.
Sincerely,
审稿人意见
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
There are two main weaknesses of this submission,
1) The use of the English language requires major revision, to the extend that it becomes very difficult for a reader to follow the material presented, and
2) the paper places great emphasis on the development of the model used, making the reading of paper cumbersome.  Instead, it could be more useful to the readership of this journal, if authors emphasized results and discussion more than model development.
In addition, although there is a discussion of the model results (i.e. "4. Model analyses", actual results of this work are never, explicitly, presented.  Therefore, discussion and conclusions drawn are based on the esoteric knowledge of the authors.
However, it should be noted that the concept introduced is interesting.  If it were better presented, it could have been a submission to be accepted.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
In this paper, the authors investigate evolutionary game of oil and gas companies’ pollution treatment. Their results show that government plays a dominant role in game process, and its strategy choice has profound and important influence on two other participants’ strategy choice, which means measures stimulating government supervision also are the measures for companies to treat pollution and for residents not to monitor pollution.
Overall, the topic of this paper is interesting. I suggestion some revisions before seriously reconsideration for publication.
1. The motivation is relatively weak. Please revise the introduction.
2. The paper needs a very careful English editing!
3. The references should be revised according to the style of this journal.
Editor's Comments to Author:
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
This can become a good paper, but it needs a lot of work both in terms of substance and editing.
I believe it would be better if the authors re-write it as a new one, taking help from a native speaker in English and taking into consideration the comments by the reviewers
and then re-submit it.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2014-03-18 18:44:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

飞鸿惊鸿

铜虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by leimin2008 at 2014-03-18 21:54:21
编辑的意见就是修改重投，比大修还难听点，但是只要按照所有审稿意见修改（1,2），以及修改英语语法语言等，然后重新投，接收希望还是很大的。个人建议，一定要严格按照审稿人和编辑的意见一条一条回答好，这样可以 ...

原来比大修还惨啊

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2014-03-18 22:37:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

小小老百姓

铜虫 (小有名气)
我个人理解感觉，还是蛮有希望滴

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2014-03-18 18:50:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leimin2008

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
飞鸿惊鸿: 金币+20, ★★★很有帮助 2014-03-19 19:30:09
飞鸿惊鸿: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2014-03-19 19:30:37
编辑的意见就是修改重投，比大修还难听点，但是只要按照所有审稿意见修改（1,2），以及修改英语语法语言等，然后重新投，接收希望还是很大的。个人建议，一定要严格按照审稿人和编辑的意见一条一条回答好，这样可以增加接收概率，祝好运。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2014-03-18 21:54:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

飞鸿惊鸿

铜虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 小小老百姓 at 2014-03-18 18:50:50
我个人理解感觉，还是蛮有希望滴

那到底是什么意思呢？

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2014-03-18 22:36:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭