24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

titankop

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 23
帖子: 2
在线: 3.8小时
虫号: 1410877
注册: 2011-09-21

[交流] 投稿International Journal of Cancer被拒了，老板要我argue，大家看看可能吗？已有3人参与

文章被拒了，但是看了下评论，老板要我argue，大家说我是按照意见修改了再argue还是先argue要求修改，再补数据，argue希望大吗？
以下是审稿意见：
05-Mar-2014
Re: IJC-14-0243

Dear XXX:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript XXX to the International Journal of Cancer. Our reviewing process has now been completed, and your paper has been reviewed by three outside referees and studied by the Editors. After careful consideration, we regret to say that we find your manuscript unsuited for publication in the IJC. Our decision is based on the lower priority of the work in light of current competition for publication and our stringent criteria. You can view the reviewer comments below.

We do hope that you find the reviews helpful and remain sorry that our answer cannot be a positive one. Thank you for your interest in IJC. We hope that this decision will not dissuade you from submitting your work again in the future.

Yours sincerely,
Prof. Peter Lichter
Editor-in-Chief
International Journal of Cancer

Reviewer: 1

Comments to Author
The manuscript by XXX shows that XXXXX（我的文章内容概括）and therefore we see significant bystander effect. The data are robust and clear.

Major criticisms:
In my opinion, this study lacks novelty,given that a recently published paper by the same group addressed similar questions except liposomes part. （但是我两篇文章看下创新点完全不一样啊，这篇是上篇的深入化，效果加强了，而且研究了机制,完全不一样啊，之前是一个载体靶向现在是双靶向啊）。

Reviewer: 2

Comments to Author
The manuscript entitled XXX demonstrates XXX（我的文章内容)。 The authors showed XXX（文章的创新点和结论，第二个评委都看懂这篇的创新意义了）。
Although there are a few points that need to be clarified, the manuscript is well written:

1. Page 5, line 31:XXX（说我一个概念不够全）. Please consider adding the following citation to the text (one example of many): XXX(需要添加的文献）。
2. Page 5, line 41: XXX （也是一个概念需要补充）. Relevant reference can be: XXX(需要添加的文献）
3. Page 7, line 51-57:XXX (我的一个结果）. Can the authors clarify the reason for not choosing the same administration route for XXX（一个需要解释为什么实验这么做的地方）?
4. Efficacy study: Did the authors perform an in vivo survival study XXX(要求补充一个体内实验）
5. Page 18, line 54: "XXX“（我的一个结论）. Please mention the reason for it: large-sized particles. （就是文字改动下）
6. Did the authors perform long-term storage stability analysis for the liposomal formulation （就是补充一个稳定性实验，其实做了只是没放上去，不成问题）?

Reviewer: 3

Comments to Author
The authors looked at the therapeutic efficacy of XXXX（文章内容）. The study demonstrates significant XXX (实验结果）, and showed potential for safe and efficient gene therapy （创新点和临床应用）. Following concerns need to be addressed:
1. Figure 2D versus 2E: The authors used XXX （让我补充一个对毒性数据的解释说明）
2. Figure 4E: The high apoptosis with XXX （我的药物） would be better reflected by quantitative data. Please provide the comparative data with ratio of apoptotic cells in a given region with each formulation.
3. Figure 4F: The goal of XXX （我的研究目的）. The integrity of the normal lung tissue would be best understood if a histologic score with each formulation is provided.
4. Many errors occur throughout the manuscript which need revision. （看来意思是需要语言上的改进，还是有语法错误）

Thanks.

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

[ Last edited by titankop on 2014-3-7 at 14:56 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

1楼 2014-03-07 14:38:32

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 465 (硕士)
金币: 23966.8
散金: 6001
红花: 18
帖子: 7925
在线: 600.9小时
虫号: 514983
注册: 2008-02-29
性别: GG
专业: 电化学

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

改投吧，高分杂志基本上没有希望

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

飞越无限

2楼2014-03-07 14:40:59

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

titankop

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 23
帖子: 2
在线: 3.8小时
虫号: 1410877
注册: 2011-09-21

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by kingki at 2014-03-07 14:40:59
改投吧，高分杂志基本上没有希望

恩，和老板再去说说，要不改投英国肿瘤那个，感觉评价不完全负面，基本都正面啊，结果大修都不给一个.
感觉后两个审稿人给的意见都是修回啊，第一个也说了robust and clear。而创新性明显第一个没看懂，后两个都看出来了

[ Last edited by titankop on 2014-3-7 at 14:47 ]

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2014-03-07 14:42:51

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖