| 查看: 3445 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
00waterh木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?
|
||
|
the title as you have seen is from TOFEL, i do know you guys like writing. and i am trying to practice my writing skill too. if you'd like to do the same, i hope you can post your writing here, let's improve our English together. here is the topic: Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there is no practical use? use specific reasons and examples to support your idea. and the rule is: write it by yourself i really hope you guys can take part in. considering of the time, i hope we can finish it before this weekend.  [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2014-3-4 at 22:07 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有7人回复
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-03-08 13:44:06
00waterh: 金币+20, persuasive examples, thanks for your good opinion. 2014-03-08 17:46:07
00waterh: ESEPI+1, i agree with your idea 2014-03-08 17:46:38
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-03-08 13:44:06
00waterh: 金币+20, persuasive examples, thanks for your good opinion. 2014-03-08 17:46:07
00waterh: ESEPI+1, i agree with your idea 2014-03-08 17:46:38
|
I think the government should give support to the research with no practical use. The research with no practical use is defined by most people as that which cannot be directly converted into econimic interests, be directly applied to industry, or directly serve us in our daily life. While it should be noticed that the so called not practical research is not useful and profitable at present not permanently. In the history of human evolution, there were so many great research outputs which looked like useless at first but were finally proved to be core technique of subsequent monumental research works that changed our life. Without the support of number theory, the information safety technology would have not got so perfect to prevent secret from being stolen in wars and bussiness competitions. If Shannon had not discovered the information theory, the communication technology would have not get so developed and we would have not accessed to so large amount of information through the Internet and would have not used our smart phones to communicate with others. Computer would have not been invented without computability theory. Weather forcast would have not been born without the development of partial differential equation theory. From the examples listed above, we can conclude that the value of some research works was hidden when they were carried out. It took hundreds of years or even longer time to discover their vaule. So the government should not be so impatient and short-sighted that some research works are not supported simply becasue they are not so practical. Please remember that every research is useful and meaningful. We say some of them are not practical, it is because that we have not found out how to use them. |
28楼2014-03-08 13:37:40
2楼2014-03-04 22:15:49
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
|
Pro: (EX: http://healthresearchfunding.org/gene-patenting-pros-cons/) "Government should fund scientific research because no private company should be allowed to patent the fruits of scientific research." Con: (EX: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol2/iss1/12/) "Government should not fund controversial scientific research, even if its practical benefits are immediate and beyond doubt." ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w133h2488597_1393973695_771.jpg#opennewwindow) The Case Against Federal Funding.jpg |
3楼2014-03-05 06:55:52
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
|
FYI: (You are welcome!) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/r ... -stress-and-repair/ -------------------------------------------- ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?-1](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w128h2488597_1393974762_292.jpg#opennewwindow) Stem Cell Research Breakthrough.jpg |
4楼2014-03-05 07:12:54
20