24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

00waterh

木虫 (知名作家)

ESEPI: 36
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.936
金币: 4731.7
散金: 9439
红花: 81
沙发: 42
帖子: 6185
在线: 939.2小时
虫号: 2129944
注册: 2012-11-16
性别: MM
专业: 神经科学、认知科学与心理

[交流] [activity] Do you agree that the government should support?

the title as you have seen is from TOFEL, i do know you guys like writing. and i am trying to practice my writing skill too. if you'd like to do the same, i hope you can post your writing here, let's improve our English together.

here is the topic:
Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there is no practical use? use specific reasons and examples to support your idea.

and the rule is: write it by yourself

i really hope you guys can take part in. considering of the time, i hope we can finish it before this weekend.

[ Last edited by 00waterh on 2014-3-4 at 22:07 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

English Writing

Eng. discussion

» 猜你喜欢

职称评审没过，求安慰已经有49人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有17人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿已经有22人回复
EST投稿状态问题已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有4人回复
三无产品还有机会吗已经有6人回复

1楼 2014-03-04 22:03:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

mac194

铁虫 (职业作家)

ESEPI: 7
应助: 128 (高中生)
金币: 21401.3
红花: 101
帖子: 3332
在线: 3370.2小时
虫号: 2488597
注册: 2013-05-30
专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型

★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30

Pro: (EX: http://healthresearchfunding.org/gene-patenting-pros-cons/)
"Government should fund scientific research because no private company should be allowed to patent the fruits of scientific research."
Con: (EX: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol2/iss1/12/)
"Government should not fund controversial scientific research, even if its practical benefits are immediate and beyond doubt."