| 查看: 3445 | 回复: 27 | |||||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
00waterh木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?
|
||||
|
the title as you have seen is from TOFEL, i do know you guys like writing. and i am trying to practice my writing skill too. if you'd like to do the same, i hope you can post your writing here, let's improve our English together. here is the topic: Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there is no practical use? use specific reasons and examples to support your idea. and the rule is: write it by yourself i really hope you guys can take part in. considering of the time, i hope we can finish it before this weekend.  [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2014-3-4 at 22:07 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有7人回复
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-
专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-03-06 18:20:58
00waterh: 金币+30, ESEPI+1, wow, come on,i love you guys.by the way, we China welcome those scientists who have lost their job in Austria 2014-03-07 08:51:05
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-03-06 18:20:58
00waterh: 金币+30, ESEPI+1, wow, come on,i love you guys.by the way, we China welcome those scientists who have lost their job in Austria 2014-03-07 08:51:05
|
Yes nowadays there is a great surplus of research students and researchers, and most of the work cannot be transformed into the actual product. Someone might say some day these work might be base stone for major discoveries in science. I’m in no position to claim this statement is right or wrong, at least in my eyes, it’s not how science works. I personally agree that most scientific researches might be redundant in terms of the transformation rate of them into daily application, but financial support from government is still necessary I reckon. Whether the government supports scientific researches or not is also a reflection whether the government believes in science itself. If the government is leaving us the impression that “we don’t trust you science people”, then disaster for the nation is coming as well, for sure. Australia is an illustrative example, forgive me but Australia repels me, seriously. The current Prime Minister doesn’t trust science. Then do you know what happened? Education budget is cut, research funding and funding grant rate are dropping, and scientists working for government organizations are losing their jobs. Then the current survey released by ABS suggests that fewer students are choosing science electives in secondary school. What to expect then? Apart from that, Australia is losing its target to cut gas emission by 5% because it’s said to be too hard to achieve the target. Funny is our Prime Minister actually appointed a guy who is even not convinced that CO2 is the major cause of warming to tackle with gas emission issues. Another funny story to share is that rubbish dumping is approved in the Great Barrier Reef. I can only type HEHE to have my opinion acrossed. Can you imagine that I’m mumbling all the way till the end of the article?  [ Last edited by Lopemann on 2014-3-6 at 19:54 ] |
22楼2014-03-06 18:20:46
2楼2014-03-04 22:15:49
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
|
Pro: (EX: http://healthresearchfunding.org/gene-patenting-pros-cons/) "Government should fund scientific research because no private company should be allowed to patent the fruits of scientific research." Con: (EX: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol2/iss1/12/) "Government should not fund controversial scientific research, even if its practical benefits are immediate and beyond doubt." ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w133h2488597_1393973695_771.jpg#opennewwindow) The Case Against Federal Funding.jpg |
3楼2014-03-05 06:55:52
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
|
FYI: (You are welcome!) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/r ... -stress-and-repair/ -------------------------------------------- ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?-1](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w128h2488597_1393974762_292.jpg#opennewwindow) Stem Cell Research Breakthrough.jpg |
4楼2014-03-05 07:12:54
20
投票: