[交流] Revise (major revisions requiring re-review)的希望大不？已有24人参与

各位虫子，帮忙看看，还有希望不？

Dear XXX,

Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field and is being rejected in its current form. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that indicate substantial revision is needed. These comments are summarized in the reviewers' comments below.

Please resubmit your paper only after you have revised along the lines recommended by the Editor/Referees. When revising your paper please consider these comments. Your resubmission is due within 90 days. Resubmission of this paper will be treated as a new submission: the paper will receive a new MS ID number and will potentially go to a new set of referees.
In the interest of rapid handling, you must also submit a brief summary or itemized list indicating how you have revised your paper from its original form.

If the reviewer comments indicate help with English language and quality is needed, we strongly advise you to consult a professional language editing service. For more information please see our Language Polishing page at http://www.elsevier.com/languagepolishing.

PLEASE NOTE: Computational Materials Science would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerseScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission.

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.

Please note that we allow 60 days for author revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Editor's/Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: （把Abstract原封不动地抄了一遍）

However, the following revisions are requested that would improve the content and presentation of the paper:

1. The simulation results should be directly on indirectly verified by experiments.
2. The English descriptions are wordy and should be more concise
3. The abstract should present the key research results.
4. The conclusions are too wordy and must be rewritten.

回复此楼