24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

kuaixiTotti

金虫 (小有名气)

英超煮帅

应助: 9 (幼儿园)
金币: 789.8
红花: 22
帖子: 277
在线: 92.6小时
虫号: 1168797
注册: 2010-12-13
性别: GG
专业: 地理信息系统

[求助] 收到杂志的意见，Major Changes 希望有多大？？已有7人参与

以下是编辑给出的两个审稿人的意见（部分具体的内容被隐掉）

Dear Mr. ***,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising a major revision of your manuscript, including language editing. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider your revised paper for publication.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. Please note that some reviewers may also have uploaded files as part of their review. If this is the case, the uploaded files are available with your submission on the ***.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point raised by the reviewers when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to *** and login as an Author.
Your username is: ***
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: ***

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

PLEASE NOTE: The journal would like to enrich online articles by visualising and providing geographical details described in Computers and Geosciences articles. For this purpose, corresponding KML (GoogleMaps) files can be uploaded in our online submission system. Submitted KML files will be published with your online article on ScienceDirect. Elsevier will generate maps from the KML files and include them in the online article.

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.

The revised version of your submission is due by May 12, 2014.

Yours sincerely,

***

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The authors proposed a new method, termed ***, to ***. Both the theoretical discussion and the experimental results validated its better performance in applications of ***.
Specific comments:
(1) ***—--give this word a detailed explanation.
(2) legends should be added to Figures 1-4. ?
(3) add the algorithm for determining the ***.
(4) What are the meanings of *** in Table 6, respectively?
(5) Detailed explanation of Table 6 should be added.
(6) give a detailed procedure for ***

Reviewer #2: The title: Abbreviation is not proper in the title. Also the term *** is not generally known. I recommend to change the title.

The language of the paper needs substantial improvement.

更多的是在文章的描述和具体的语法细节上的建议，这里就不在详细展示了。

请问这样的意见，修改以后被接收的可能性有多大呢？？？

回复此楼