24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

miniyejin

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1358.1
帖子: 89
在线: 22小时
虫号: 244340
注册: 2006-04-16
专业: 常微分方程与动力系统

[求助] 关于论文修改问题！已有1人参与

想请问各位大侠
我最近一篇文章投到Physica A这个杂志，第一个审稿人给了一堆的意见感觉没法回答，修改的时候没有管它。就把第二个审稿人的意见好好的答复了一下就提交了。这两天论文又被编辑返回说没有答复第一个审稿人的问题，我确实不知怎么办请各位虫友帮忙!如下是第一个审稿人的审稿意见：
- In this context, would any positive power > 1 of the prey density in the
denominator be treatable in the same manner? Would the proofs just carry
over?(这句话没看懂意思？)

- Also in the introduction, I would find it useful to first describe the
simple mean-field rate equation solutions (in the absence of Brownian
noise). These could then compared in Sec.5 with the numerical simulations.
It seems that the population densities shown in Figs. 1-3 fluctuate about
their mean given by basically the rate equation solutions. Are the
associated variances given just be the noise correlator strengths?
(simple mean-field rate equation solutions (in the absence of Brownian
noise)这个理论不熟悉，请高人指点！)

- Are the plots obtained with just a single noise history realization
each? Shouldn't there be averages over a sufficiently large number of
noise histories? Are there periodicities in the data, which could be
uncovered by temporal Fourier transforms? Are the predators in Fig. 3
truly becoming extinct? The data shown is not clear - there could be a
population recovery as in earlier times.
关键他的一些问题我没看懂，请大家帮忙分析，谢谢！

回复此楼