| 查看: 479 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
关于转基因食品 长期，多代数动物喂养安全评估的实验综述
|
|
知道很多反转的人懒得查文献，所以就把这篇评估的综述放在这里，方便大家看。 http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0278691511006399 这是文章的摘要，结尾的结论是GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed。 The aim of this systematic review was to collect data concerning the effects of diets containing GM maize, potato, soybean, rice, or triticale on animal health. We examined 12 long-term studies (of more than 90 days, up to 2 years in duration) and 12 multigenerational studies (from 2 to 5 generations). We referenced the 90-day studies on GM feed for which long-term or multigenerational study data were available. Many parameters have been examined using biochemical analyses, histological examination of specific organs, hematology and the detection of transgenic DNA. The statistical findings and methods have been considered from each study. Results from all the 24 studies do not suggest any health hazards and, in general, there were no statistically significant differences within parameters observed. However, some small differences were observed, though these fell within the normal variation range of the considered parameter and thus had no biological or toxicological significance. If required, a 90-day feeding study performed in rodents, according to the OECD Test Guideline, is generally considered sufficient in order to evaluate the health effects of GM feed. The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有16人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有16人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有13人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有6人回复
-
应该是下周三26日公布了吧？
已经有4人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有7人回复
-
今天放榜没戏了吧
已经有11人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有12人回复
-
基金啊基金
已经有4人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有13人回复
姜博1988
铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
尐吖头莪喜欢拽拽的过日孓！
- 应助: 77 (初中生)
- 金币: 5609.6
- 散金: 5670
- 红花: 208
- 沙发: 231
- 帖子: 11837
- 在线: 645.8小时
- 虫号: 2907753
- 注册: 2013-12-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 作物种质资源与遗传育种学
2楼2014-02-10 20:34:34
