| 查看: 506 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
关于转基因食品 长期,多代数动物喂养安全评估的实验综述
|
|
知道很多反转的人懒得查文献,所以就把这篇评估的综述放在这里,方便大家看。 http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0278691511006399 这是文章的摘要,结尾的结论是GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed。 The aim of this systematic review was to collect data concerning the effects of diets containing GM maize, potato, soybean, rice, or triticale on animal health. We examined 12 long-term studies (of more than 90 days, up to 2 years in duration) and 12 multigenerational studies (from 2 to 5 generations). We referenced the 90-day studies on GM feed for which long-term or multigenerational study data were available. Many parameters have been examined using biochemical analyses, histological examination of specific organs, hematology and the detection of transgenic DNA. The statistical findings and methods have been considered from each study. Results from all the 24 studies do not suggest any health hazards and, in general, there were no statistically significant differences within parameters observed. However, some small differences were observed, though these fell within the normal variation range of the considered parameter and thus had no biological or toxicological significance. If required, a 90-day feeding study performed in rodents, according to the OECD Test Guideline, is generally considered sufficient in order to evaluate the health effects of GM feed. The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有7人回复
求教各位大神:2026教育部人文社科青年基金项目何时公示呀?
已经有6人回复
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有8人回复
科研求助
已经有4人回复
博士去二本高校当辅导员,如何调整心态?
已经有11人回复
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
闲聊
已经有3人回复
姜博1988
铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)
尐吖头莪喜欢拽拽的过日孓!
- 应助: 77 (初中生)
- 金币: 5609.6
- 散金: 5670
- 红花: 208
- 沙发: 231
- 帖子: 11837
- 在线: 645.8小时
- 虫号: 2907753
- 注册: 2013-12-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 作物种质资源与遗传育种学

2楼2014-02-10 20:34:34









回复此楼